A father’s fight to maintain contact with his son came a step closer recently, it was revealed in Family Law Week, when he won a second appeal against a case which originally saw all contact restricted between the man and his son.

In the original case heard in February last year at the Family Court in Reading, a young boy’s step-father had applied both for an adoption order and a no order for contact, thereby cutting off all contact between the biological father and the boy. His Honour Judge Oliver permitted both orders, based principally on an annexe A report.

An annexe A report is a document prepared by a local authority officer, based on research into the case. Its aim is to ensure the safeguarding of a child, particularly where that child is not represented in the adoption proceedings.
Six months after the original hearing, the case came before His Honour Judge Tolson QC. The judge heard that there were several issues which effectively made the annexe A report flawed. Of most concern was the fact that the social worker who had carried out the assessment on the boy’s biological father – a necessary part of an annexe A report – was in fact a colleague of the boy’s mother. In addition, the report failed to address the key question of whether the boy had been alienated from his biological father.

The question was then debated, as to whether the report was biased, and HHJ Tolson instructed that another, independent social worker, should address the issues of adoption and contact. In addition, he ordered that the annexe A should have an addendum, to highlight the areas which had been identified as being flawed.

An appeal was granted, to which the step-father and mother were initially opposed but later took up a more neutral position. The appeal took place at the Court of Appeal in November and was heard by Lord Justice Richards, Rt. Hon. Sir Ernest Ryder and Lord Justice Sales.

The day prior to the proceedings, the boy’s step-father and mother wrote to the court, explaining that they would be absent for childcare reasons but that they offered no strong opposition to a revised annexe A being submitted, provided that their son’s viewpoint was accurately recorded and interpreted.

The court found that the original annexe A document was indeed flawed and so should not be relied upon as evidence but removed from the bundle. Thereafter, the submission of a new annexe A by an independent social worker was ordered.

Got a question? Ask us now…

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

I had a 30-minute consultation with Samantha Jago where she clearly explained all my options and followed up with a detailed email of notes. I would highly recommend if you need help to clarify where you stand and getting options for how you move forward.

Jun 2024   Katherine Davey

I recently had a one hour pro bono consultation with Samantha Jago. I was really blown away by how much she was able to digest in such a short period of time and even more so by the report which I received shortly after.

Apr 2024   S DF

I had applied for a free consultation and I was contacted in a very short timeframe. Thank you so much for the insightful and thorough consultation, Kevin Danagher. You made me feel at ease and you provided clear expectations with the initial info I had provided... I have now a much better understanding on my query.

Feb 2024   Sonia Accardi

We had a very useful first consultation with Amber Matheson today. Amber took the time to understand our (somewhat complicated) set-up, and offered good, understandable advice on next steps. She followed up with a very thorough email clarifying what we had discussed. Highly recommended.

Feb 2024   Lucie

Lovely friendly experience. All questions were answered so that I understood completely.

Dec 2023   Ali Catlin

Very balanced, fair and pragmatic advice. Thoroughly recommend!!

Nov 2023   James Elliott

Henry graciously provided his time for a consultation. I found him to be highly knowledgeable, empathetic and he provided excellent advice which put my mind at ease. Would highly recommend Henry and his firm.

Oct 2023   Allan Ang

Henry Brookman went above and beyond during the free consultation, and even overran the allocated time. He provided invaluable professional advice in a courteous manner. I recommend his firm without reservation.

Sep 2023   Mario Ignatov

I only had my initial free review with Amelia yet I already feel much more strengthened in my legal and financial position. I am currently reflecting on the steps I want to take to negotiate my desired outcome of the financial settlement but, when I am ready to use the services of a lawyer, Amelia is definitely the top on my list.

Sep 2023   Nahid Toubia

I had a zoom consultation with Lauren Moir and she was incredible. Very patient, insightful and reassuring. She also advised me based on my previous conversations with another firm and also clarified various positions I am in. Highly recommend.

Aug 2023   Gary Hawes

I was very impressed with the friendly, helpful and professional service offered by Brookman Solicitors. The generous advice and knowledge offered during the initial free consultation has enabled us to have a much better understanding of our case and plan a way forward.

Jul 2023   Peter Jackson

I had a first consultation with Kevin, who very diligently and professionally provided an exhaustive overview of the divorce process and the best approach for my specific case.

Jul 2023   Giulia Matteo

Great service and excellent advice at the initial consultation. I would certainly recommend and use in the future.

Jul 2023   Tom James

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 8470