In 2010 the case of Radmacher v Granatino made headlines in England. The case confirmed that pre-nuptial agreements could be binding in the UK in the right circumstances.

Recently this issue has been re-examined in the case of Luckwell v Limata.  Victoria Luckwell is the daughter of one of Britain’s wealthiest men, Mike Luckwell, the director of the media company that created the children’s programme ‘Bob the Builder’.  Mike Luckwell is estimated to have a £135,000,000 fortune.  Victoria Luckwell began living with her then boyfriend Francesco Limata in 2004.  The parties became in engaged and were married on 23rd July 2005. They now have three young children.  Shortly before the marriage both Victoria and Francesco signed a pre-nuptial agreement (also referred to as a pre-marital agreement) confirming they would keep their own property and would not make claims against the others property.  The pre-nuptial agreement specifically referred to gifts given to Victoria by her “wealthy family”.  During the course of the marriage the parties signed two further agreements as and when Victoria’s family gave her substantial gifts which included a property in Connaught Square, where the former Prime Minister Tony Blair owns a home.

By the breakdown of the marriage Francesco had no property of his own, his pre-owned flat had been sold and the equity dissipated.  Francesco had not been in employment since 2012 save beyond working in his mother’s hotel on an ad hoc basis for minimum wage.  Victoria helped out in her mother’s business on occasions but had not been formally employed since 2005. Victoria had been maintained by way of substantial allowances from each of her parents, who also paid the children’s school fees.

A High Court Family Division Judge Mr Justice Holman ruled that despite the agreement proper provision must be made for Francesco in particular to avoid the divorce having a damaging impact on the couple’s three children.  The Judge was concerned that the children could find themselves living with their mother “in relative luxury” and then staying with their father who was in debt and lacked assets “in penury”.  The Judge commented that if the genders had been reversed it was “inconceivable that the agreements would outweigh making a substantial award to the wife even if the children were primarily living with the husband and only intermittently staying with her.”

The Judge looking at the pre-nuptial agreements said that though great weight would be given to them and Francesco had no claim at all on the parties’ assets based on contributions, compensation or sharing.  The only consideration that outweighed those considerations was his “need”.  The weakness or unfairness of the agreements in this matter were that from the start they provided nothing at all for Francesco irrespective of how long the parties had been married or how great his need was on the breakdown of the marriage.  The Judge found that Francesco was now in a “predicament of real need” while Victoria enjoyed “sufficiency or more”.

The Judge ordered that the former matrimonial home at Connaught Square be sold to release the equity of £6,7400,000. Of this Victoria was then to provide up to £900,000 for the purchase of a three bedroom property for Francesco’s use, but, the property was not owned by Francesco.  When the youngest child turns twenty two the property is to be sold and 45% of the net proceeds will be returned to Victoria.  The rest will be used to purchase a smaller property for Francesco.  Over and above this Victoria was to provide a further net figure of £292,000 to allow Francesco to furnish the property to purchase a car and to pay off his debts, of over £200,000.  This left Victoria with £5,500,000 which allowed her to meet the children’s school fees estimated at £1,100,000. She then retained capital of £4,400,000 which was divided to provide a housing fund of £3,000,000 for her and the children, with a further £1,400,000 to meet her expenses going forward.

This case shows is that it is extremely important that when drafting up a pre-nuptial agreement that care is taken to deal with anticipated changes, such as children being born.  Had the pre-nuptial agreement made some provision for Francesco it is clear the original agreement could have been upheld and expensive and lengthy litigation through the courts could have been avoided.

Got a question? Ask us now…

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

Really appreciated Brookman's advice and support. Most lawyers charge extortionate fees just for an initial conversation but not Henry. Thanks for all your advice and time.

Jul 2022   Chloé

I had a consultation with the partner Henry Brookman. I can absolutely recommend him, he seemed knowledgeable, up to date and patient. I have found him to be straightforward in the answers he gives and down to earth. 100% recommended.

Jun 2022   Michael P

I have no hesitation whatsoever in recommending Henry Brookman. His advice came in promptly when solicited, and was excellent. He is a thoughtful and very professional lawyer. He understood perfectly well the issue I presented him with, and gave me excellent advice in a family law related matter.

May 2022   Philip Hands

From my first contact with the firm I was treated courteously and promptly. I was offered a pro bono meeting shortly after making contact. Mr Brookman is clearly a very experienced professional and in our meeting he gave me some well considered and objective advice about my rather complicated situation which spans more than one jurisdiction.

May 2022   Julian Peachey

I had an initial consultation with Henry Brookman regarding prenuptial agreements and found him to be very helpful and knowledgeable.

Mar 2022   Simon Brooks

I had a free telephone consultation yesterday with Gavin Yeung. He could not have been more helpful and reassuring as he calmly and patiently worked through my situation to provide me with clarity and piece of mind at a time it was really needed and emotions are running high.

Mar 2022   'K M'

I spoke with Aziz at Brookman Solicitors on the phone for an initial consultation and he is one of the friendliest lawyers I have met. He is clearly very experienced as he patiently explained me all the concepts and processes which are quite daunting for someone in my situation, and then focused on the actual questions I wanted to ask... I would highly recommend Aziz and Brookman Solicitors.

Feb 2022   'R'

I am grateful for Henry Brookman and his team for support they provided to me during very frustrating time of divorce. They respond promptly to any request. I felt more confident after I started the process with them. Henry listened carefully to me and took quick actions on my case. I highly recommend this team of real professionals even for non-UK citizens.

Feb 2022   Sezim Beksultanova

I had online consultation with the partner Henry Brookman today. I was very happy with the service. I found him to be very insightful, knowledgeable and provided sound advice, as well as being kind and patient. It was a very comfortable discussion and he sent an email detailing our discussion very quickly discussing in our meeting in depth. I am amazed by the service we got just from a free consultation. I would highly recommend these solicitors!

Jan 2022   Shirley Christopher

We spoke at length and at no point felt like he was rushing us and we felt very comfortable. After our discussion we were also quickly sent an email detailing everything we were discussing in our meeting in depth. I am amazed by the service we got just from a free consultation. I would highly recommend these solicitors!

Dec 2021   Tina

I was fortunate to spend an hour running through a few questions with Natasha Slabas. She was quick to grasp the points raised and proposed a sensible way forward. Would recommend

Dec 2021   Nick Powell

I cannot praise the professionalism and courtesy too highly. The advice given in a very complex divorce matter, was clear, concise, enlightening and inspiring.

Nov 2021   Mary Barn

I contacted Henry Brookman because of the complex international aspect of my divorce and I’m very glad I did... Henry took his time explaining all the pro’s and contra’s... I now have a much clearer view over the situation and feel more confident going forward. I’m very grateful for the excellent advice I’ve received and not feeling rushed during the meeting.

Nov 2021   'A B'

Talitha offers sound advice, asks the right questions and advises you with what you need to know not just what you want to hear. I have no hesitation in recommending her services.

Sep 2021   Anu Vidyarthi

Henry took the time to go through all the details of my separation thoroughly. He was very clear on what my options were and what I needed to do to have a seamless agreement with my ex. Thank you for all your help!

Aug 2021   Sandeep Cina

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 8470