The Court of Appeal very recently dealt with an interesting if complicated legal argument concerning foreign proceedings.  The case concerned a husband and wife, both Indian Nationals and both living in India.  They lived together in England for two years, from 2007 to 2009.  The wife moved back to India in 2010, and the husband moved back to India in April 2012.  However, he had already begun divorce proceedings in 2009 against the wife in India.  Over two years later, in 2011, the wife issued her own petition for divorce in England.  The English court had jurisdiction because at the time the husband was still living here.  On the other hand the Indian courts also had jurisdiction.

The courts in India could make consequential financial orders, and so could the courts in England, but almost certainly the English courts would be more favourable to the wife than the Indian courts would be.  That of course had to be the reason she filed divorce proceedings here.

The husband applied to stay the wife’s English petition.  He said that India was the more appropriate forum to hear the proceedings.  The wife appealed.  She (or rather her barristers) argued that the judge did not have the power to order a stay of the wife’s petition.

Now historically the English courts have always had a discretion to stay English proceedings if there are competing foreign proceedings concerning the same issue.  The test is a broad one, weighing up the factors as to whether the foreign courts would be better placed to hear the matter, whether a proper level of justice could be delivered, and overall whether it is the more appropriate forum.

However, the European Court of Justice in 2005 appeared to say that this discretion no longer applied by reason of the Brussels Regulation governing which countries courts had priority.  The European Court of Justice held that the Brussels Convention did not just apply between European Union States, it bound all EU Member States even in relation to non-member States.  The ECJ had decided that in hearing the case of Owusu –v- Jackson.  Mr Owusu was British, living in Britain.  So was Mr Jackson, but Mr Jackson owned a holiday villa in Jamaica.  Mr Owusu rented it for a short holiday, suffered a serious accident whilst on holiday, and sued Mr Jackson for compensation.  He filed the proceedings in England.  Mr Jackson applied to stay those proceedings on the ground that Jamaica was the more convenient forum.  The question for the ECJ was whether the court’s discretionary power to stay proceedings was compatible with the Brussels Convention, and it held that it was not.  It said that the rules of jurisdiction must be highly predictable and should guarantee certainty.

In this recent case though the Court of Appeal overruled the wife’s argument and upheld the stay.  It said that the Brussels II (Revised) Regulation that applies to matrimonial proceedings is worded differently to the one that governed Owusu –v- Jackson.

The leading judgment also noted with some relief that there was a similar decision made by the Cour de Cassation in France in 2009, and he dryly commented “the conclusion I have reached cannot, therefore, be regarded as a peculiarity of an island race of common lawyers.  It is one that is shared by our civilian colleagues in mainland Europe.”

One apparently throwaway remark in the judgment gives me some concern.  The leading judgment says that if the courts in India exercised their jurisdiction “…if they do so, orders of the courts in India will be recognised in England.”  One hopes that the Lord Justice did not think that financial orders would be enforced in England as a matter of right, because the law on that aspect is most uncertain.  Certainly a divorce granted in India, where the parties plainly had a real connection with India would certainly be recognised, but anyone relying on subsequent enforcement of financial orders may be in for a nasty surprise.

Got a question? Ask us now…

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

Really appreciated Brookman's advice and support. Most lawyers charge extortionate fees just for an initial conversation but not Henry. Thanks for all your advice and time.

Jul 2022   Chloé

I had a consultation with the partner Henry Brookman. I can absolutely recommend him, he seemed knowledgeable, up to date and patient. I have found him to be straightforward in the answers he gives and down to earth. 100% recommended.

Jun 2022   Michael P

I have no hesitation whatsoever in recommending Henry Brookman. His advice came in promptly when solicited, and was excellent. He is a thoughtful and very professional lawyer. He understood perfectly well the issue I presented him with, and gave me excellent advice in a family law related matter.

May 2022   Philip Hands

From my first contact with the firm I was treated courteously and promptly. I was offered a pro bono meeting shortly after making contact. Mr Brookman is clearly a very experienced professional and in our meeting he gave me some well considered and objective advice about my rather complicated situation which spans more than one jurisdiction.

May 2022   Julian Peachey

I had an initial consultation with Henry Brookman regarding prenuptial agreements and found him to be very helpful and knowledgeable.

Mar 2022   Simon Brooks

I had a free telephone consultation yesterday with Gavin Yeung. He could not have been more helpful and reassuring as he calmly and patiently worked through my situation to provide me with clarity and piece of mind at a time it was really needed and emotions are running high.

Mar 2022   'K M'

I spoke with Aziz at Brookman Solicitors on the phone for an initial consultation and he is one of the friendliest lawyers I have met. He is clearly very experienced as he patiently explained me all the concepts and processes which are quite daunting for someone in my situation, and then focused on the actual questions I wanted to ask... I would highly recommend Aziz and Brookman Solicitors.

Feb 2022   'R'

I am grateful for Henry Brookman and his team for support they provided to me during very frustrating time of divorce. They respond promptly to any request. I felt more confident after I started the process with them. Henry listened carefully to me and took quick actions on my case. I highly recommend this team of real professionals even for non-UK citizens.

Feb 2022   Sezim Beksultanova

I had online consultation with the partner Henry Brookman today. I was very happy with the service. I found him to be very insightful, knowledgeable and provided sound advice, as well as being kind and patient. It was a very comfortable discussion and he sent an email detailing our discussion very quickly discussing in our meeting in depth. I am amazed by the service we got just from a free consultation. I would highly recommend these solicitors!

Jan 2022   Shirley Christopher

We spoke at length and at no point felt like he was rushing us and we felt very comfortable. After our discussion we were also quickly sent an email detailing everything we were discussing in our meeting in depth. I am amazed by the service we got just from a free consultation. I would highly recommend these solicitors!

Dec 2021   Tina

I was fortunate to spend an hour running through a few questions with Natasha Slabas. She was quick to grasp the points raised and proposed a sensible way forward. Would recommend

Dec 2021   Nick Powell

I cannot praise the professionalism and courtesy too highly. The advice given in a very complex divorce matter, was clear, concise, enlightening and inspiring.

Nov 2021   Mary Barn

I contacted Henry Brookman because of the complex international aspect of my divorce and I’m very glad I did... Henry took his time explaining all the pro’s and contra’s... I now have a much clearer view over the situation and feel more confident going forward. I’m very grateful for the excellent advice I’ve received and not feeling rushed during the meeting.

Nov 2021   'A B'

Talitha offers sound advice, asks the right questions and advises you with what you need to know not just what you want to hear. I have no hesitation in recommending her services.

Sep 2021   Anu Vidyarthi

Henry took the time to go through all the details of my separation thoroughly. He was very clear on what my options were and what I needed to do to have a seamless agreement with my ex. Thank you for all your help!

Aug 2021   Sandeep Cina

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 8470