Here for you: Please note that Brookman’s services remain uninterrupted during this time. Read more

You Keep the Clubcard Points, I’ll Take the Goldfish

Date: October 25th, 2012 - Written by: Brookman Solicitors

Some divorcing couples are willing to go to almost any lengths to ensure that their divorce settlement includes ‘custody’ of their most cherished possessions.

Fair enough, some personal possessions could well have sentimental value – understandably, many people will be reluctant to give up ownership of their pets for example.

But here we are talking about such everyday items as Air Miles, Clubcard points, bed linen, vacuum cleaners, dustbins and frying pans. For one divorcing couple – the owners of a prized stallion – the financial settlement hinged on how the horse semen was to be divided up!

In some divorce cases, protracted discussions centre around seemingly trivial belongings, rather than high-priced assets like cars or homes as you might expect. People can become attached to the most unlikely household objects.

Meet me at the service station  – and bring the pan

As reported in the press, one disgruntled husband, whose ex-wife had made off with his favourite frying pan when she moved out, kept her engagement ring in a bid for revenge.  Once negotiations were concluded, they agreed to meet at a motorway service station halfway between their new properties, to exchange the items in a sort of hostage-release-style handover.

A volatile marriage needn’t necessarily mean an acrimonious divorce

‘Loose Woman’ Carol McGiffin, has described her former marriage to DJ Chris Evans as “chaotic.” She says in her recent autobiography: “We argued all the time. Our rows were pathetic. We had one about a can of deodorant – the second he’d bought in the eight months he’d been living with me. He seemed to think he was some sort of hero for buying it, so I suggested that he might have bought some of the other things he used all the time, such as toothpaste. Next morning, he squeezed the toothpaste that was left down the lavatory.”

However, when it came to their divorce settlement, Evans’ accountant asked what McGiffin wanted; she duly replied, and the agreements were drawn up without any squabbling.

Can a court ruling be taken too literally?

This week it was reported that a Serbian farmer, Branko Zivkov, 76, had taken exception to a court ruling which stated that he had to share half his farm equipment with his former wife of 45 years.

Zivkov took extreme action in the form of a mechanical grinder, which he used to slice his machinery and farming tools in two.

He told Belgrade daily tabloid Kurir: “I still haven’t decided how to split the cow. She should just say what she wants – the part with the horns, or the part with the tail.”

Share:
Tags: , ,

Google Reviews

Brookman Solicitors

62 Reviews

Nik Carter 10/05/2020

I recently had a free initial consultation with Henry Brookman via video conference. He was considered and meticulous in his approach and gave me well thought through advice. He followed this up with a letter in writing summarising the advice he gave me. I would thoroughly recommend his services to anyone looking for legal representation in a divorce.

Sarah Jones 02/05/2020

Henry was extremely helpful and pleasant to speak with. He provided comprehensive advice in a matter of hours and responded promptly to any queries I had. I would highly recommend speaking with him.

Shazan Awam 19/04/2020

Very helpful and thorough advice. Highly Recommend!

Pierre Sauvage 15/04/2020

I met with Henry Brookman for an initial consultation in order to consider if a prenup agreement was the best course of action for my marriage. He spent the time to answer all my questions and encouraged me to do the right thing. I recommend dealing wit Henry Brookman and it was a pleasant experience.

Jamie Warnes 16/03/2020

Excellent service. I had a consultation directly with Mr Brookman and his advice and guidance was very clear and helpful. Would highly recommend.