Here for you: Please note that Brookman’s services remain uninterrupted during this time. Read more

Can English Courts Change A Foreign Financial Order?

Date: July 2nd, 2019 - Written by: Brookman Solicitors

 

We’ve written extensively about forum shopping in these advice pages. In particular we’ve explained why the financially weaker spouse in a divorce will often try – where possible – to have financial proceedings decided by a judge in England and Wales. Different jurisdictions have different rules and priorities when it comes to division of assets on divorce. Rightly or wrongly, the courts here have traditionally been viewed as having greater flexibility and discretion than those in some other countries.

What happens then, when having failed to have a case heard in London, one spouse is unhappy with the way a foreign court has decided financial matters. Does he or she have any way of challenging that decision in the English courts?

 

Examining The Foreign Court’s Decision

Part III of the Matrimonial and Family Proceedings Act 1984 (‘MFPA’) is one way a foreign financial order can be examined by the courts here and alternative ways of dividing assets considered.

Although not used widely, the MFPA can be a highly effective tool for spouses unhappy with a foreign financial settlement. But only if the conditions for its use are satisfied. One recent case brought under the MFPA surprised some family lawyers because it showed the courts here are clearly willing to permit a closer examination of a foreign court’s financial order in the correct circumstances. The case, Vasilyeva v Shemyakin was one where at the outset the outcome of the MFPA application was in no way certain.

 

Getting Court’s Permission To Apply For A New Financial Order

Before making the application for a financial order the spouse seeking relief must first seek the permission or ‘leave’ of the court to do so. And the spouse will only clear this hurdle if the court is satisfied that he or she has ‘substantial grounds’ for making the application.

In the case we mentioned above – Vasilyeva v Shemyakin – the wife, Elena Vasilyeva asked the court’s permission to make an application for financial relief in England and Wales following a financial order made by a Russian family court following her divorce from her husband, Boris Shemyakin.

Under the Russian decision Ms Vasilyeva was due to receive a Moscow flat valued at £1million together with approximately £430,000 worth of shares. Her argument was that this was only a tiny fraction of the matrimonial wealth. Some reports have suggested the actual value of matrimonial assets was over £100 million.

In a forthright judgment Mr Justice Williams indicated that despite the best efforts of both the English and Russian lawyers involved in the case he had found it impossible to fully untangle the nature of the proceedings held in Russia. He had however been able to establish that:

  • Russian judges don’t have the same discretion to divide assets as those in England
  • The courts in Russia don’t always require full and frank disclosure of marital assets
  • Russian courts divide assets not values

So did the wife have the required substantial ground for making an application for financial relief? (The judge, referring back to earlier cases, confirmed that ‘substantial’ in this context meant ‘solid’.)

Having reviewed all the available information the judge decided to allow Ms Vasilyeva to proceed on to a full application for financial relief. He did so mindful of the fact that Mr Shemyakin had sought asylum in the UK and had lived in London for a number of years. In addition the marriage had been based here for the past two years. Mr Justice Williams also highlighted that the husband had failed to produce full documentary disclosure of his financial assets. Crucially the judge was unable to establish whether the Russian court order was in fact intended to be a full and final settlement of each side’s claims.

 

What Way Can English Court Change Foreign Order?

The impact of a successful application under MFPA can be significant. The courts have the power to make any of the orders it can make in a financial provision case originally heard in England and Wales. That’s to say it can make any order available under Part II of the Matrimonial Causes Act, 1973, including pension adjustment orders and orders for maintenance payments.

Where the application under the MFPA has been allowed only because a home is located in England and Wales there are certain limitations on the type of order the court can make.

 

Comment

Some lawyers have suggested that the decision in Vasilyeva indicates a willingness on the part of the English courts to intervene in foreign decisions. Some even argue that MFPA allows the English courts too much leeway to interfere in the judgments of foreign courts.

But we should be clear: Judges here won’t entertain a request to make an application under MFPA if it is undeserved. Particularly if it is made simply to take advantage of what many think is the generosity of English courts toward the financially weaker spouse. Nor will spouses be able to use the MFPA to have a so-called ‘second bite of the cherry’. A straightforward difference in a foreign award and one that a disgruntled spouse may achieve in England and Wales won’t be enough to clear the initial hurdle of seeking the court’s leave to make an application.

If you are considering making an application under the MFPA it’s essential to seek specialist advice early. Before undertaking a case like this your international divorce lawyer should examine carefully the nature of the foreign court’s decision – paying particular attention to the extent to which assets were disclosed to the foreign court and how the foreign judge divided them.

At Brookman we have an extensive network of legal specialists in jurisdictions around the world enabling us to carry out this task effectively. If you would like to discuss your case further please call us on 44 (0) 20 7430 8470 or contact us online.

 

Share:

Google Reviews

Brookman Solicitors

70 Reviews

Yesima Hamid 04/09/2020

I want to highly commend Brookman Solicitors firm. I had the privilege of getting very thorough and sensible advice from their solicitor Jennifer Douglas. I don't have enough praise for her. She made me feel at ease and 'got me' and understood very well all the issues and her advice was on point. I felt she had my interest at heart in all the different matters. She was very accommodating and willing. She truly made a difference. She has great insight and I truly recommend her and the firm. They are very professional with the human touch.

Roohie Mahajan 16/08/2020

I am so happy that I hired their services. I am from India and it was my international divorce case. My ex husband is in the UK. I had a free telephone conversation with Henry Brookman and I was so satisfied that without even meeting him I was so confident. My case was handled in the best way possible.

He is probably the one of the best lawyers in the world. He is extremely competent, professional, intelligent and empathetic. The only lawyer who genuinely work to help you rather than making money. He is a very experienced lawyer and he saved me so much money. He is so calm and kind towards his approach. He is the most genuine person I have come across.

I just came to London once to attend my hearing. My husband and his solicitors made it so complicated. My ex husband has to spend double the amount of legal fees than me. This is the difference between hiring a good experienced lawyer. Their fees might be expensive but good lawyer will make you save money at the end. Finally at the end I won the case and my husband has to pay all my legal fees without me travelling to the UK. I will always be eternally grateful to Henry Brookman and Brookman Solicitors. I am falling short of words to praise them.

I highly recommend their services. Keep up the good work.

Jen Ade 23/07/2020

I had an initial consultation and Henry was well prepared. He gave great advice and followed through quite quickly. He was very helpful.

Chris Mullins 15/07/2020

Henry and team were most professional, considerate and efficient when handling the financial proceedings owing to my overseas divorce. I recommend their services highly. International circumstance was at first to me most daunting and confusing, given each country had its' own unique approach. Thankfully Henry was knowledgeable of the law on either side of the seas and able therefore to provide best guidance and reasoning to me which enabled favourable settlement!

Wim Jansen 24/06/2020

I contacted Brookman to ask for information regarding the validity of an international divorce court ruling. They were very quick in providing me with the right information. When I had another question a few months later around children matters I phoned them again and after taking some background information and contact details they booked me in for a free telephone consultation with 1 of their partners Talitha Brookman. She spent half an hour of her time explaining to me what I could expect and provided legal advice. All was free of charge. I would not hesitate to contact them again should any matter become more formal and have to go through court. The service has been quick, professional and very friendly.