As regular readers of our blog know well, the Hague Convention on Child Abduction – or to give it its proper title, the Hague Convention on the International Aspects of Child Abduction – is of primary importance in preventing inter-country abductions.  Before the introduction of the Hague Convention, if a child was abducted from one country to another, the parent or parents had to start proceedings in the country to which the child had been taken.  When the Convention was being negotiated in the 1970s and 80s, the heart-breaking and eye catching cases were where a child had been taken from a parent or both parents by a third party, often a relative but sometimes a stranger.  It quickly became apparent though that in fact most cases of cross-country child removal arose from one parent removing the child from the other.  The Hague Convention tackled the problem by establishing two broad principles:-

(a)    The principle that if a party has “Rights of Custody” they can use the Convention to assist them; and

(b)   That the country where the child was habitually resident prior to his or her removal should be the one that decides the long term issues of custody, visitation etc.

This meant then that the only proceedings that needed to take place in the country to which the child had been taken were summary proceedings enforcing a return.  The courts of the country to which the child had been taken were not involved in arguments about the merit of who should have custody etc.

Initially the Convention received widespread support through the Western hemisphere.  Slowly but surely countries that initially held out (e.g. Belgium) have acceded to the Convention.  Now there have been two very significant accessions to the Convention that move it beyond the “Western hemisphere club.”  Japan and now Russia have joined.

It is slightly too soon for parents in this distressing situation to rejoice.  In both countries the legal machinery has to be established.  There has to be a central authority with responsibility to deal on a reciprocal basis with other countries to handle incoming and outgoing requests for return.  There needs to be judicial training so that judges understand what is expected of them.  Lastly there has to be an effective means of enforcing the orders the judges make.

Russia has indicated that it is not applying the Convention retrospectively.  It is not clear whether that is a fixed policy decision, or whether it is merely a pragmatic decision to enable the Convention to be put into effect in a manageable way.

In any case, the “automatic return” that the Convention tries to achieve does not apply after a year has elapsed from the abduction, unless there are particular circumstances.

It is to be hoped that the significant extension by these two influential countries will set an example for others to follow.

Got a question? Ask us now…

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

I had a 30-minute consultation with Samantha Jago where she clearly explained all my options and followed up with a detailed email of notes. I would highly recommend if you need help to clarify where you stand and getting options for how you move forward.

Jun 2024   Katherine Davey

I recently had a one hour pro bono consultation with Samantha Jago. I was really blown away by how much she was able to digest in such a short period of time and even more so by the report which I received shortly after.

Apr 2024   S DF

I had applied for a free consultation and I was contacted in a very short timeframe. Thank you so much for the insightful and thorough consultation, Kevin Danagher. You made me feel at ease and you provided clear expectations with the initial info I had provided... I have now a much better understanding on my query.

Feb 2024   Sonia Accardi

We had a very useful first consultation with Amber Matheson today. Amber took the time to understand our (somewhat complicated) set-up, and offered good, understandable advice on next steps. She followed up with a very thorough email clarifying what we had discussed. Highly recommended.

Feb 2024   Lucie

Lovely friendly experience. All questions were answered so that I understood completely.

Dec 2023   Ali Catlin

Very balanced, fair and pragmatic advice. Thoroughly recommend!!

Nov 2023   James Elliott

Henry graciously provided his time for a consultation. I found him to be highly knowledgeable, empathetic and he provided excellent advice which put my mind at ease. Would highly recommend Henry and his firm.

Oct 2023   Allan Ang

Henry Brookman went above and beyond during the free consultation, and even overran the allocated time. He provided invaluable professional advice in a courteous manner. I recommend his firm without reservation.

Sep 2023   Mario Ignatov

I only had my initial free review with Amelia yet I already feel much more strengthened in my legal and financial position. I am currently reflecting on the steps I want to take to negotiate my desired outcome of the financial settlement but, when I am ready to use the services of a lawyer, Amelia is definitely the top on my list.

Sep 2023   Nahid Toubia

I had a zoom consultation with Lauren Moir and she was incredible. Very patient, insightful and reassuring. She also advised me based on my previous conversations with another firm and also clarified various positions I am in. Highly recommend.

Aug 2023   Gary Hawes

I was very impressed with the friendly, helpful and professional service offered by Brookman Solicitors. The generous advice and knowledge offered during the initial free consultation has enabled us to have a much better understanding of our case and plan a way forward.

Jul 2023   Peter Jackson

I had a first consultation with Kevin, who very diligently and professionally provided an exhaustive overview of the divorce process and the best approach for my specific case.

Jul 2023   Giulia Matteo

Great service and excellent advice at the initial consultation. I would certainly recommend and use in the future.

Jul 2023   Tom James

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 8470