New guidelines detailing controlling or coercive behaviour

Date: January 15th, 2016 - Written by: Brookman Solicitors



The Home Office recently issued guidelines in support of the new Serious Crime Act 2015, which was passed on 3 March last year.

The guidelines, detailed in Family Law Week, aim to support the police, criminal justice agencies, non-governmental and voluntary organisations in the application of this legislation.

Controlling or coercive behaviour in intimate or familial relationships, as detailed below, is now classed as an offence which can attract a fine or carry a custodial sentence of up to five years.

Because of its potential ambiguity, it is important that the definition of controlling or coercive behaviour is firmly defined. To be convicted under the Serious Crime Act 2015, the perpetrator must have demonstrated this behaviour “repeatedly or consistently” and have been “personally connected” to the victim at the time the behaviour was taking place. It must have had a “serious effect” on the individual and must have caused them to fear for their safety on “at least two occasions”. Otherwise, it may have had a “substantial adverse effect on the victims’ day to day activities”. In addition, the perpetrator must have been aware of the potential effect their behaviour would have upon their victim.

The Home Office has listed seventeen types of behaviour which it would consider to be controlling or coercive:

  • Isolation from friends and family
  • Deprivation of basic needs
  • Monitoring of how time is spent
  • Monitoring person using online or technological tools
  • Taking control of person’s everyday life and activities
  • Deprivation of supporting or essential services
  • Deliberate destruction of self-esteem
  • Enforcement of rules designed to humiliate, degrade or dehumanise
  • Forcing person to take part in criminal activity
  • Financial abuse – restriction of money for basic necessities
  • Threats to injure or kill
  • Threats to a child
  • Threats to reveal private information which would damage to person
  • Assault
  • Criminal damage
  • Rape
  • Preventing person from accessing transport or working

It is also important to note that this behaviour need not be restricted to the home environment, but can also take place through communication from a distance.


Google Reviews

Brookman Solicitors

48 Reviews

Jo Hannah 13/02/2019

I am very thankful to Mr Henry Brookman for his time, understanding and advice. I would highly recommend this firm.

Jeffrey Schenck 06/02/2019

Henry Brookman listened carefully and provided clear, thoughtful, sound advice that took into account the complexity of my situation. All of my dealings with the firm were handled with sensitivity and respect. I would definitely recommend the services of Brookman Solicitors.

Ilona Galiyeva 29/01/2019

I’ve dealt with Mr. Brookman himself and he is very peasant to work with. Listens to your demands and is very helpful in terms of providing advice.

Milla Linke 24/01/2019

Mr Brookman is very professional and helpful. After my initial consultation I have more clarity and understanding into my situation. I would highly recommend this firm.

Mr Man 09/01/2019

VERY PROFESSIONAL . My initial telephone contact to this firm was handled very professionally. First impressions really do matter. The details of my enquiry were taken and I soon became eased to believe that I being listened to and relevant details were being noted. My subsequent initial assessment interview was just as thorough and professional, consistent with my previous experience. Choosing a solicitor to act on your behalf is a very important consideration. Although my case is still on going, I have every confidence and peace of mind that I will be concluded well.