Why It Pays To Follow The Correct Legal Process

Date: July 13th, 2015 - Written by: Brookman Solicitors



The High Court has heard that alleged negligence by a solicitor resulted in a successful property developer ending up on the breadline, reports The Daily Telegraph. The case, which called before Mr. Justice Charles, involved an action for damages raised by Norma Wilson against a Berkshire-based firm of solicitors.

The court heard that, prior to their separation in 2006, Mrs. Wilson, a nurse and property developer, had lived with her husband, a consultant anaesthetist, in a desirable detached property near Ascot.

When Mrs. Wilson and her husband separated in 2006, they decided to press on with plans for the re-development of the former matrimonial home. The couple reached an agreement whereby Mrs. Wilson would pay her husband £500,000 for his share of the house. She would then obtain finance to complete the development, whereupon she would pay a further £1 million to her husband.

The settlement between Mrs. Wilson and her husband was not, however, approved by a judge. When her husband thereafter registered a matrimonial rights restriction over the property, Mrs. Wilson was unable to obtain finance to complete the development work.

Faced with heavy repayments on the property, Mrs. Wilson ended up selling it for £1.9 million, much less than had been contemplated. After paying off the mortgage and other loans, her financial situation was such that she had to apply for income support and move into a one bedroom council flat.

Mrs. Wilson blamed her dramatic change in fortunes on the alleged negligence of a solicitor she and her husband had consulted in connection with the financial settlement agreed between them.

Giving evidence in support of her claim, Mrs. Wilson said that her aim in reaching a settlement had been to save money by bringing the costs involved in the divorce action to an end. She told the court that the solicitor had not informed her that a consent order of settlement was ineffective until approved by the court. Moreover, he had also failed to warn her of the risks involved in implementing any of the settlement terms before the consent order had been judicially approved.

Francis Bacon, counsel for the defendants, who denied liability, said that the sole remit of the solicitor consulted by the Wilsons had been to draw up a consent order encapsulating the terms of the agreement which they had already reached between themselves. Mr. Bacon added that it had not been part of the solicitor’s brief to give advice about the wisdom of the proposed settlement or the likelihood of being able to obtain finance. In short, said Mr. Bacon, “it was no part of the defendant’s duty to protect the claimant, who on her own case was an experienced property developer, against her commercial misjudgements.”

Mr. Justice Charles observed that the terms of the couple’s agreement were “a recipe for disaster” and that things had gone “completely wrong”.

Following the completion of Mrs. Wilson’s evidence, the parties agreed to settle the case on a confidential basis.


Google Reviews

Brookman Solicitors

48 Reviews

Jo Hannah 13/02/2019

I am very thankful to Mr Henry Brookman for his time, understanding and advice. I would highly recommend this firm.

Jeffrey Schenck 06/02/2019

Henry Brookman listened carefully and provided clear, thoughtful, sound advice that took into account the complexity of my situation. All of my dealings with the firm were handled with sensitivity and respect. I would definitely recommend the services of Brookman Solicitors.

Ilona Galiyeva 29/01/2019

I’ve dealt with Mr. Brookman himself and he is very peasant to work with. Listens to your demands and is very helpful in terms of providing advice.

Milla Linke 24/01/2019

Mr Brookman is very professional and helpful. After my initial consultation I have more clarity and understanding into my situation. I would highly recommend this firm.

Mr Man 09/01/2019

VERY PROFESSIONAL . My initial telephone contact to this firm was handled very professionally. First impressions really do matter. The details of my enquiry were taken and I soon became eased to believe that I being listened to and relevant details were being noted. My subsequent initial assessment interview was just as thorough and professional, consistent with my previous experience. Choosing a solicitor to act on your behalf is a very important consideration. Although my case is still on going, I have every confidence and peace of mind that I will be concluded well.