Divorce hacking emailA City derivatives broker has been accused of hacking into his ex-wife’s e-mail account in a bitter dispute over the division of matrimonial property.

The Telegraph reports that the Court of Appeal has heard an application from Daniel Arbili to have the financial settlement made at the time of his divorce in 2013 re-opened on the basis of new evidence.

The court heard that Mr. and Mrs Arbili were married in 2005, but separated in 2012. Divorce proceedings followed in 2013, at which time the judge, Michael Horowitz QC, ordered that the matrimonial property, including their £1 million home in Essex, two houses in France and an Aston Martin, should be split equally between them.

Shortly thereafter, but before Judge Horowitz delivered his formal judgement, Mr. Arbili tried to have the case re-opened, citing new evidence. This evidence took the form of e-mails which he said had been recovered by a private investigator instructed on his behalf by a French enquiry agent. He claimed that these e-mails showed that his wife may have been in line for a windfall from the sale of her parents’ £2.1 million home in the French Alps; this being information which had not been known to him or the court when the financial settlement was determined.

Mr. Arbili failed, however, to name the enquiry agent or disclose his instructions to them. Judge Horowitz refused to consider the new evidence or re-open the case. Mr. Arbili therefore lodged an appeal.

The Court of Appeal judges, Lady Justice Macur and Sir Bernard Rix, were told by Mr. Arbili’s barrister, Jeremy Hall QC, that the financial settlement had left Mrs. Arbili with a disproportionately large share of the matrimonial property.

The barrister argued that if Judge Horowitz was not going to include Mrs. Arbili’s potential interest in her parents’ home as part of the matrimonial property, he should also have disregarded a £300,000 property which was in Mr. Arbili’s name but was occupied by his parents. Judge Horowitz, said Mr. Hall had treated two valuable capital assets differently and had, “over-catered for the wife’s need and paid scant regard to the husband’s.”

Counsel for Mrs. Arbili, Bruce Blair QC, told the court that the difference between the two properties was that Mr. Arbili had paid for the property occupied by his parents during the marriage, whereas Mrs. Arbili’s parents had paid for the property occupied by them. Mrs. Arbili’s interest in that property could only be realised upon the death of her parents.

Mr. Blair went on to say that Mr. Arbili had obtained the e-mail evidence by hacking into Mrs. Arbili’s computer. This evidence, having been obtained by a “gross invasion” of privacy, was considered illicit and should not be considered by the court.

In any event, said Mr. Blair, the evidence was irrelevant, as his client’s parents had not proceeded with the sale of their home. Moreover, the money which would have been realised had the sale gone ahead would have been used by his client’s parents to purchase another home.

The appeal judges reserved their decision until a later date.

Got a question? Ask us now…

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

Henry listened carefully to my circumstances, offered practical solutions, and explained the steps I need to take in a way that was easy to understand. His approach was genuinely helpful and empathetic, making a challenging time much easier to navigate.

Jul 2024   Tracy Henin

They were quick to respond and organise a consultation regarding my divorce proceedings. Henry was very knowledable and personable and the advice given really gave me the clarity I needed in an uncertain situation.

Jul 2024   Rebecca Lowe

My initial free consultation with Natasha Slabas was just over an hour and very informative. Natasha helped me understand the situation and the next steps involved. I would definitely proceed with Brookman Solicitors in the future if required. They were very quick to book the initial consultation and very professional.

Jul 2024   Rajan Marwaha

Had an initial free talk with them. I was impressed with their honesty and understanding of the situation.

Jun 2024   Dianne Wilkins

I had a 30-minute consultation with Samantha Jago where she clearly explained all my options and followed up with a detailed email of notes. I would highly recommend if you need help to clarify where you stand and getting options for how you move forward.

Jun 2024   Katherine Davey

I recently had a one hour pro bono consultation with Samantha Jago. I was really blown away by how much she was able to digest in such a short period of time and even more so by the report which I received shortly after.

Apr 2024   S DF

I had applied for a free consultation and I was contacted in a very short timeframe. Thank you so much for the insightful and thorough consultation, Kevin Danagher. You made me feel at ease and you provided clear expectations with the initial info I had provided... I have now a much better understanding on my query.

Feb 2024   Sonia Accardi

We had a very useful first consultation with Amber Matheson today. Amber took the time to understand our (somewhat complicated) set-up, and offered good, understandable advice on next steps. She followed up with a very thorough email clarifying what we had discussed. Highly recommended.

Feb 2024   Lucie

Lovely friendly experience. All questions were answered so that I understood completely.

Dec 2023   Ali Catlin

Very balanced, fair and pragmatic advice. Thoroughly recommend!!

Nov 2023   James Elliott

Henry graciously provided his time for a consultation. I found him to be highly knowledgeable, empathetic and he provided excellent advice which put my mind at ease. Would highly recommend Henry and his firm.

Oct 2023   Allan Ang

Henry Brookman went above and beyond during the free consultation, and even overran the allocated time. He provided invaluable professional advice in a courteous manner. I recommend his firm without reservation.

Sep 2023   Mario Ignatov

I only had my initial free review with Amelia yet I already feel much more strengthened in my legal and financial position. I am currently reflecting on the steps I want to take to negotiate my desired outcome of the financial settlement but, when I am ready to use the services of a lawyer, Amelia is definitely the top on my list.

Sep 2023   Nahid Toubia

I had a zoom consultation with Lauren Moir and she was incredible. Very patient, insightful and reassuring. She also advised me based on my previous conversations with another firm and also clarified various positions I am in. Highly recommend.

Aug 2023   Gary Hawes

I was very impressed with the friendly, helpful and professional service offered by Brookman Solicitors. The generous advice and knowledge offered during the initial free consultation has enabled us to have a much better understanding of our case and plan a way forward.

Jul 2023   Peter Jackson

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 8470