Amazon Chief’s Divorce Delivers A Lesson On Financial Settlements

Date: April 29th, 2019 - Written by: Brookman Solicitors


When the world’s richest man gets divorced the media is bound to be interested. And when Amazon boss Jeff Bezos and wife Mackenzie announced their intention to split in January 2019 it was against a background of salacious tabloid stories about what had led to the break up of the 25-year marriage. Given the mix of huge wealth and an alleged extra marital affair it would not have been hard to imagine a long, acrimonious battle over reported assets of $137 billion.

In fact, the opposite occurred. Three months after the initial divorce announcement the couple tweeted details of their financial settlement. Arrived at entirely amicably it seems, and – perhaps more crucially – without any need for a public examination of their financial holdings.

It’s to the couple’s credit that they have achieved such a settlement. And it’s a lesson to anyone going through divorce that, whatever the circumstances, a negotiated settlement – and all the advantages that go with it – is always possible.



If assets as great as those in the Bezos’ marital pot can be divided amicably despite all the public, commercial and media pressure, why can’t all divorces be settled in this way? We are members of Resolution so we encourage as non-confrontational an approach as possible to family problems. This includes negotiated financial settlements.

An agreed settlement has several advantages:

  • It will be worked out in private, away from court. You will simply have to ask the court to endorse a consent order once you have reached agreement with your spouse.
  • You can reduce the possibility of acrimony and potentially reduce the impact of divorce on any children of a marriage.
  • It avoids the risk of the unknown. The current court rules mean judges have discretion when it comes to deciding the financial outcome in any particular case. As a result it can sometimes be difficult to forsee how a particular judge will approach financial matters.

So there are clear advantages to a negotiated settlement. But in our experience this type of approach only works effectively if both sides adopt a constructive attitude to reaching a settlement. If the genuine desire to avoid court is not there, litigation may well be the only way to decide matters.



The approach of courts to financial settlements differs from country to country. At Brookman Solicitors in London we represent family law clients in many legal jurisdictions and are familiar with the financial settlement rules internationally.

The Bezos family appear to have resided in Washington State. Despite owning properties in several countries Washington is likely to have been the venue for any contested divorce hearing. If they had gone to court there, the rules generally dictate that assets acquired during the marriage are divided by the parties. This does not necessarily mean equal division. Rather, a split is made that is ‘just and equitable’. So if a court were to decide that Mr Bezos was responsible for generating more of the couple’s wealth it’s likely that he would have receive more than half of any court-decided settlement.

In England and Wales the courts have a significant degree of flexibility when it comes to deciding financial orders. In medium to long-term marriages the starting point is an equal division of assets. But judges can employ a series of factors to depart from this general rule. As we have pointed previously it would be wrong to assume that equal sharing of assets in England and Wales is automatic.



The Bezos case is encouraging. It shows that with the right legal advice and a constructive attitude couples can avoid asking a court to divide assets – no matter how complicated the facts of the case. A good family law solicitor will try to find an agreement. But he or she will always be alert to those cases where there is bad faith, incomplete disclosure of assets or unjustified delay on one side. In such circumstances there must be a readiness to go to court if it becomes clear that it is in the interests of the client to do so.

For further advice please call us on 44 (0) 20 7430 8470 or contact us online.


Google Reviews

Brookman Solicitors

51 Reviews

Jo Hannah 09/03/2019

I am very thankful to Mr Henry Brookman for his time, understanding and advice. I would highly recommend this firm.

Jeffrey Schenck 06/02/2019

Henry Brookman listened carefully and provided clear, thoughtful, sound advice that took into account the complexity of my situation. All of my dealings with the firm were handled with sensitivity and respect. I would definitely recommend the services of Brookman Solicitors.

Ilona Galiyeva 29/01/2019

I’ve dealt with Mr. Brookman himself and he is very peasant to work with. Listens to your demands and is very helpful in terms of providing advice.

Milla Linke 24/01/2019

Mr Brookman is very professional and helpful. After my initial consultation I have more clarity and understanding into my situation. I would highly recommend this firm.

Mr Man 09/01/2019

VERY PROFESSIONAL . My initial telephone contact to this firm was handled very professionally. First impressions really do matter. The details of my enquiry were taken and I soon became eased to believe that I being listened to and relevant details were being noted. My subsequent initial assessment interview was just as thorough and professional, consistent with my previous experience. Choosing a solicitor to act on your behalf is a very important consideration. Although my case is still on going, I have every confidence and peace of mind that I will be concluded well.