There are many reasons why clients might wish to enter nuptial agreements – pre and post marriage. Generally speaking, the English courts will give effect to an agreement that is freely entered into by the parties so long as each fully appreciates the financial and other implications of the agreement.

There’s a caveat however. If one side wishes to set a nuptial agreement aside courts will look at the current circumstances and consider if it would be unfair to hold the parties to the agreement.  If it would be, then courts will be reluctant to order strict enforcement.

The 2022 case of SC v TC which we discuss below is an example of a court refusing to attach any weight to a post nuptial agreement that, from all appearances, met many of the tests for nuptial agreements. It’s a reminder that such agreements will not always be automatically recognised by the courts.

SC v TC: What Does The Law Say About Post Nuptial Agreements?

In SC v TC Judge Hess provided a detailed explanation of the law on nuptial agreements. It can be briefly summarised as follows:

  • When it comes to deciding what weight attached to agreements from a legal perspective there is no real difference between pre and post nuptial agreements.
  • For an agreement to be fully enforceable each party should have had available all material relevant to his or her decision to enter the agreement.
  • Each party should intend the agreement to govern the financial consequences of the marriage coming to an end.
  • If the agreement is freely entered into and each party fully appreciates its importance then the courts will give full effect to the agreement unless it would be unfair in all the circumstances to hold the parties to their agreement.
  • The very fact that there is an agreement in place can have the effect of altering what the court might otherwise have decided was ‘fair’.
  • Almost inevitably there will be some element of pressure on both sides to enter a pre pr post nuptial agreement. But in the end each party is free to make the choice to enter the agreement or not. If undue pressure can’t be established the court is likely to uphold the agreement.
  • A number of factors are recognised that can undermine the effect of a nuptial agreement. These include fraud, duress, misrepresentation and exploitation of the emotional state of one of the parties by the other.
  • The court retains an overall section 25 discretion to reach a fair outcome in financial proceedings irrespective of whether there is a nuptial agreement in place or not.

What Happened In SC v TC?

The couple had been married in 1994. The husband was an investment banker.

From about 2003/2004 the husband began to experience the early effects of Parkinson’s Disease and his condition was eventually diagnosed in 2011. By 2013 the marriage had started to become strained and at some point the husband visited a sex worker. Feeling guilty he told the wife who asked for a divorce. Ultimately however she agreed not to separate if the husband entered a post nuptial agreement.

Both sides got legal advice and signed the agreement. The husband’s solicitor expressed deep concern about the terms of the agreement.  It effectively gave the wife 80% of the marital assets in the event of a divorce, The husband refused to countenance the solicitor’s advice that the agreement should be renegotiated in a way that was fairer to him.

When the marriage did fail, and the divorce proceedings started, the husband sought a half share of the assets and asked the court to ignore the post nuptial agreement.

No Weight Attached To Post Nuptial Agreement

After a review of all the facts Judge Hess decided he could not attach any weight to the post nuptial agreement. In reaching his conclusion he admitted that he had been troubled by the circumstances in which the agreement came to be signed. Why, Judge Hess wondered, would somebody engaging in rational thought sign a document which was so manifestly to his disadvantage? The husband would have been entitled to assets of possibly £2,500,000 but signed a post nuptial agreement that gave him approximately £1,000,000.

The judgment in SC v TC illustrates how courts will look at the prevailing circumstances at the time reliance on a post nuptial agreement is sought. Even though the formalities for a valid agreement appeared to have been observed the judge nevertheless refused to attach any weight to the agreement because:

  • It was very much to the husband’s disadvantage in financial terms.
  • At the time that it was signed, the husband was a vulnerable person and the wife ‘rather took advantage of that vulnerable situation’ to gain a substantial financial advantage.
  • Enforcement of the agreement could leave the husband in a predicament of real need.

Comment

This case demonstrates that even pre and post nuptial agreements that appear on the face of it to meet all the legal requirements for validity might nevertheless not be enforced if they do not meet the fundamental principle of fairness.

It will rarely be possible to predict what might be fair at that future point when the marriage breaks down and the agreement kicks in. However, an experienced family solicitor will always be able to provide considered advice on the appropriateness or otherwise of the terms of any proposed post nuptial agreement.

Got a question? Ask us now…

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

I had a 30-minute consultation with Samantha Jago where she clearly explained all my options and followed up with a detailed email of notes. I would highly recommend if you need help to clarify where you stand and getting options for how you move forward.

Jun 2024   Katherine Davey

I recently had a one hour pro bono consultation with Samantha Jago. I was really blown away by how much she was able to digest in such a short period of time and even more so by the report which I received shortly after.

Apr 2024   S DF

I had applied for a free consultation and I was contacted in a very short timeframe. Thank you so much for the insightful and thorough consultation, Kevin Danagher. You made me feel at ease and you provided clear expectations with the initial info I had provided... I have now a much better understanding on my query.

Feb 2024   Sonia Accardi

We had a very useful first consultation with Amber Matheson today. Amber took the time to understand our (somewhat complicated) set-up, and offered good, understandable advice on next steps. She followed up with a very thorough email clarifying what we had discussed. Highly recommended.

Feb 2024   Lucie

Lovely friendly experience. All questions were answered so that I understood completely.

Dec 2023   Ali Catlin

Very balanced, fair and pragmatic advice. Thoroughly recommend!!

Nov 2023   James Elliott

Henry graciously provided his time for a consultation. I found him to be highly knowledgeable, empathetic and he provided excellent advice which put my mind at ease. Would highly recommend Henry and his firm.

Oct 2023   Allan Ang

Henry Brookman went above and beyond during the free consultation, and even overran the allocated time. He provided invaluable professional advice in a courteous manner. I recommend his firm without reservation.

Sep 2023   Mario Ignatov

I only had my initial free review with Amelia yet I already feel much more strengthened in my legal and financial position. I am currently reflecting on the steps I want to take to negotiate my desired outcome of the financial settlement but, when I am ready to use the services of a lawyer, Amelia is definitely the top on my list.

Sep 2023   Nahid Toubia

I had a zoom consultation with Lauren Moir and she was incredible. Very patient, insightful and reassuring. She also advised me based on my previous conversations with another firm and also clarified various positions I am in. Highly recommend.

Aug 2023   Gary Hawes

I was very impressed with the friendly, helpful and professional service offered by Brookman Solicitors. The generous advice and knowledge offered during the initial free consultation has enabled us to have a much better understanding of our case and plan a way forward.

Jul 2023   Peter Jackson

I had a first consultation with Kevin, who very diligently and professionally provided an exhaustive overview of the divorce process and the best approach for my specific case.

Jul 2023   Giulia Matteo

Great service and excellent advice at the initial consultation. I would certainly recommend and use in the future.

Jul 2023   Tom James

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 8470