Divorce Hearings Publicity And Privacy

Many couples wish to keep their financial affairs private during the divorce process. When Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt found themselves on the receiving end of negative publicity they quickly engaged a private judge to deal with all aspects of their divorce – away from the media spotlight. This option is not usually open to individuals in England and Wales – no matter how high their profile or net worth. The desire for privacy is understandable. It is simply not always achievable. But sometimes the thought of negative or simply intrusive publicity can focus minds and lead more readily to a negotiated agreement.

The rules relating to the reporting of financial remedy hearings have long been the subject of debate. Judges, family lawyers and campaigners continue to weigh up the competing principles of open justice and an individual’s right to privacy. The result is a certain lack of clarity in relation to what financial details may or may not find their way into the public domain.

Recent Decisions On Financial Privacy

Already in 2017 there have been two key decisions in this area. In January the Court of Appeal rejected divorcee Tina Norman’s application for the retention of existing reporting restrictions surrounding her financial claims against her ex-husband.

Ms Norman had argued that national press reports following earlier hearings had resulted in her being the subject of ‘scathing personal criticism’. In its judgment the court reiterated the current position:

  • Hearings will take place in public
  • The parties will be named
  • The hearing and any consequential judgment may be reported  – unless there are cogent reasons why the court thinks it right to depart from that position.

In this case the media’s right to freedom of expression and the principle of open justice outweighed Ms Norman’s right to privacy. The court pointed out that:

  • Ms. Norman’s case is that her husband allegedly repeatedly and dishonestly failed to disclose assets. The court ruled that any reporting of these proceedings would involve very little intrusion on, or interference with, her reasonable expectations of privacy.
  • The issue at stake – whether a former wife should be entitled to claim continued spousal maintenance and not be required to go back to work – is an issue that merits public debate.

Some observers have also suggested that the decision may have been influenced by the fact that there were no minor children involved.

Almost simultaneously, footballer Ryan Giggs succeeded in obtaining what the press reported as a ‘gagging order’ in respect of the financial settlement he is currently negotiating with his wife. The order prohibited the media from publishing or broadcasting any report “that refers to or concerns any of the parties’ financial information”. Initially Mr Giggs had attempted to exclude the press from the court hearings entirely but chose to withdrew that application.

Transparency v Privacy – The Debate Continues

The champion of greater transparency in the family courts, including financial hearings is Sir James Munby. Following extensive consultation with lawyers in Australia, where family courts have been held in open hearings for the last 30 years, he has called for greater openness, arguing that “the public has a legitimate interest in being able to read what is being done by the judges in its name”.

On the other hand there are judges like Mr Justice Mostyn who regard financial hearings as “quintessentially private business’ and have called for the privacy of the parties to be fiercely protected.

Is it right to hold the threat of unwanted publicity over divorcing couples? Divergent views of leading judges mean that whether or not a case will be publicised might be something of a lottery. It is why so many family lawyers and campaign groups are seeking further clarity on the issue.

Of course one way to avoid publicity completely is to take the matter out of the courts’ hands and resolve matters through arbitration or mediation. Although this is only really effective when both parties are constructive in approach and do not use the process as a way of spinning matters out needlessly.

Got a question? Ask us now…

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

Really appreciated Brookman's advice and support. Most lawyers charge extortionate fees just for an initial conversation but not Henry. Thanks for all your advice and time.

Jul 2022   Chloé

I had a consultation with the partner Henry Brookman. I can absolutely recommend him, he seemed knowledgeable, up to date and patient. I have found him to be straightforward in the answers he gives and down to earth. 100% recommended.

Jun 2022   Michael P

I have no hesitation whatsoever in recommending Henry Brookman. His advice came in promptly when solicited, and was excellent. He is a thoughtful and very professional lawyer. He understood perfectly well the issue I presented him with, and gave me excellent advice in a family law related matter.

May 2022   Philip Hands

From my first contact with the firm I was treated courteously and promptly. I was offered a pro bono meeting shortly after making contact. Mr Brookman is clearly a very experienced professional and in our meeting he gave me some well considered and objective advice about my rather complicated situation which spans more than one jurisdiction.

May 2022   Julian Peachey

I had an initial consultation with Henry Brookman regarding prenuptial agreements and found him to be very helpful and knowledgeable.

Mar 2022   Simon Brooks

I had a free telephone consultation yesterday with Gavin Yeung. He could not have been more helpful and reassuring as he calmly and patiently worked through my situation to provide me with clarity and piece of mind at a time it was really needed and emotions are running high.

Mar 2022   'K M'

I spoke with Aziz at Brookman Solicitors on the phone for an initial consultation and he is one of the friendliest lawyers I have met. He is clearly very experienced as he patiently explained me all the concepts and processes which are quite daunting for someone in my situation, and then focused on the actual questions I wanted to ask... I would highly recommend Aziz and Brookman Solicitors.

Feb 2022   'R'

I am grateful for Henry Brookman and his team for support they provided to me during very frustrating time of divorce. They respond promptly to any request. I felt more confident after I started the process with them. Henry listened carefully to me and took quick actions on my case. I highly recommend this team of real professionals even for non-UK citizens.

Feb 2022   Sezim Beksultanova

I had online consultation with the partner Henry Brookman today. I was very happy with the service. I found him to be very insightful, knowledgeable and provided sound advice, as well as being kind and patient. It was a very comfortable discussion and he sent an email detailing our discussion very quickly discussing in our meeting in depth. I am amazed by the service we got just from a free consultation. I would highly recommend these solicitors!

Jan 2022   Shirley Christopher

We spoke at length and at no point felt like he was rushing us and we felt very comfortable. After our discussion we were also quickly sent an email detailing everything we were discussing in our meeting in depth. I am amazed by the service we got just from a free consultation. I would highly recommend these solicitors!

Dec 2021   Tina

I was fortunate to spend an hour running through a few questions with Natasha Slabas. She was quick to grasp the points raised and proposed a sensible way forward. Would recommend

Dec 2021   Nick Powell

I cannot praise the professionalism and courtesy too highly. The advice given in a very complex divorce matter, was clear, concise, enlightening and inspiring.

Nov 2021   Mary Barn

I contacted Henry Brookman because of the complex international aspect of my divorce and I’m very glad I did... Henry took his time explaining all the pro’s and contra’s... I now have a much clearer view over the situation and feel more confident going forward. I’m very grateful for the excellent advice I’ve received and not feeling rushed during the meeting.

Nov 2021   'A B'

Talitha offers sound advice, asks the right questions and advises you with what you need to know not just what you want to hear. I have no hesitation in recommending her services.

Sep 2021   Anu Vidyarthi

Henry took the time to go through all the details of my separation thoroughly. He was very clear on what my options were and what I needed to do to have a seamless agreement with my ex. Thank you for all your help!

Aug 2021   Sandeep Cina

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 8470