The question of how assets are divided on divorce rarely has a precise answer. While there may well be a presumption that assets should be split on a 50:50 basis, this is certainly not a hard and fast rule. We’ve previously examined instances where a court may depart from the idea of splitting assets down the middle. Here we look at when a court may be more likely to apply a 50:50 split. In doing so we should point out that the ‘yardstick of equality’ (as family law judges refer to it) only goes so far. Every divorce is decided on its own set of facts, and courts are empowered to use their discretion to achieve a financial settlement that’s fair in all the circumstances.

Can We Decide How To Split Assets Without A Judge?

Yes. Most disputes about financial settlements never reach court. The cases that do – and that are therefore reported – are often ‘big money’ cases where the amounts at stake are so significant that it is worth the parties shouldering the risk of large legal fees. Other cases that reach court might be those that raise novel or complex points of law that require a judicial opinion.

The reality is that most cases we, and other family lawyers handle are resolved privately between the parties. Solicitors on both sides use previous court decisions to inform their advice to you about what you should seek in terms of a financial settlement. This includes guidance on the circumstances in which a court might order a 50:50 split and those when it might not.

What If We Can’t Agree How TO Divide Assets?

If there is no agreement the court will decide the terms of a financial settlement. Decisions will first and foremost be based on the principle of fairness we’ve mentioned. The courts will consider:

  • The income, earning capacity, property and other financial resources of each spouse or civil partner
  • The financial obligations each of the parties to the marriage has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future
  • The standard of living enjoyed by the family before the breakdown of the marriage
  • The age of each party
  • The duration of the marriage
  • Any physical or mental disability of either of the parties to the marriage
  • The contributions which each of the parties has made or is likely in the foreseeable future to make to the welfare of the family

Note that where there are young children, the court’s first concern will always be their welfare and how their needs will be met.

Does The Length Of My Marriage Matter When Dividing Assets?

One of the factors listed above is duration of the marriage. When it comes to splitting assets, the length of your marriage can be crucial in determining whether assets will be split equally or not. A 50:50 split is more likely when there has been a long marriage, and the resources are sufficient to meet the needs of the family. Where there is a short, childless marriage of, say, less than two years the courts are less likely to order a 50:50 split.

P v Q (2022) – When Assets Are Divided Equally

The way a long marriage can dictate asset division was demonstrated in the 2022 case of P v Q. There, the matrimonial pot of assets was about £6million, two thirds of which was tied up in a company in which both husband and wife were involved. Both parties argued that they should each receive approximately 60% of the available assets (as opposed to 50%). The wife argued that the husband continued to receive a substantial salary from the company (she did not). The husband on the other hand argued that post-divorce the wife would have the advantage of controlling most of the marital property (the capital assets like property). He on the other hand would still be largely reliant on the potentially unpredictable performance of a company.

The judge indicated that in a long marriage like this – where there were no issues of conduct or disability to consider – then as a starting point in the division of assets – fairness and equality (a 50:50 split) ‘usually ride hand in hand’. Referring to an earlier case he confirmed that as a general guide, equality should be departed from only if, and to the extent that, there is good reason for doing so.

In the circumstances of this case the arguments made by both husband and wife to deviate from an equal split had the effect of cancelling each other out. As a result, a split of more or less 50:50 was ordered.

Got a question? Ask us now…

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

I had a consultation with the partner Henry Brookman. I can absolutely recommend him, he seemed knowledgeable, up to date and patient. I have found him to be straightforward in the answers he gives and down to earth. 100% recommended.

Jun 2022   Michael P

I have no hesitation whatsoever in recommending Henry Brookman. His advice came in promptly when solicited, and was excellent. He is a thoughtful and very professional lawyer. He understood perfectly well the issue I presented him with, and gave me excellent advice in a family law related matter.

May 2022   Philip Hands

From my first contact with the firm I was treated courteously and promptly. I was offered a pro bono meeting shortly after making contact. Mr Brookman is clearly a very experienced professional and in our meeting he gave me some well considered and objective advice about my rather complicated situation which spans more than one jurisdiction.

May 2022   Julian Peachey

I had an initial consultation with Henry Brookman regarding prenuptial agreements and found him to be very helpful and knowledgeable.

Mar 2022   Simon Brooks

I had a free telephone consultation yesterday with Gavin Yeung. He could not have been more helpful and reassuring as he calmly and patiently worked through my situation to provide me with clarity and piece of mind at a time it was really needed and emotions are running high.

Mar 2022   'K M'

I spoke with Aziz at Brookman Solicitors on the phone for an initial consultation and he is one of the friendliest lawyers I have met. He is clearly very experienced as he patiently explained me all the concepts and processes which are quite daunting for someone in my situation, and then focused on the actual questions I wanted to ask... I would highly recommend Aziz and Brookman Solicitors.

Feb 2022   'R'

I am grateful for Henry Brookman and his team for support they provided to me during very frustrating time of divorce. They respond promptly to any request. I felt more confident after I started the process with them. Henry listened carefully to me and took quick actions on my case. I highly recommend this team of real professionals even for non-UK citizens.

Feb 2022   Sezim Beksultanova

I had online consultation with the partner Henry Brookman today. I was very happy with the service. I found him to be very insightful, knowledgeable and provided sound advice, as well as being kind and patient. It was a very comfortable discussion and he sent an email detailing our discussion very quickly discussing in our meeting in depth. I am amazed by the service we got just from a free consultation. I would highly recommend these solicitors!

Jan 2022   Shirley Christopher

We spoke at length and at no point felt like he was rushing us and we felt very comfortable. After our discussion we were also quickly sent an email detailing everything we were discussing in our meeting in depth. I am amazed by the service we got just from a free consultation. I would highly recommend these solicitors!

Dec 2021   Tina

I was fortunate to spend an hour running through a few questions with Natasha Slabas. She was quick to grasp the points raised and proposed a sensible way forward. Would recommend

Dec 2021   Nick Powell

I cannot praise the professionalism and courtesy too highly. The advice given in a very complex divorce matter, was clear, concise, enlightening and inspiring.

Nov 2021   Mary Barn

I contacted Henry Brookman because of the complex international aspect of my divorce and I’m very glad I did... Henry took his time explaining all the pro’s and contra’s... I now have a much clearer view over the situation and feel more confident going forward. I’m very grateful for the excellent advice I’ve received and not feeling rushed during the meeting.

Nov 2021   'A B'

Talitha offers sound advice, asks the right questions and advises you with what you need to know not just what you want to hear. I have no hesitation in recommending her services.

Sep 2021   Anu Vidyarthi

Henry took the time to go through all the details of my separation thoroughly. He was very clear on what my options were and what I needed to do to have a seamless agreement with my ex. Thank you for all your help!

Aug 2021   Sandeep Cina

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 8470