The question of how assets are divided on divorce rarely has a precise answer. While there may well be a presumption that assets should be split on a 50:50 basis, this is certainly not a hard and fast rule. We’ve previously examined instances where a court may depart from the idea of splitting assets down the middle. Here we look at when a court may be more likely to apply a 50:50 split. In doing so we should point out that the ‘yardstick of equality’ (as family law judges refer to it) only goes so far. Every divorce is decided on its own set of facts, and courts are empowered to use their discretion to achieve a financial settlement that’s fair in all the circumstances.

Can We Decide How To Split Assets Without A Judge?

Yes. Most disputes about financial settlements never reach court. The cases that do – and that are therefore reported – are often ‘big money’ cases where the amounts at stake are so significant that it is worth the parties shouldering the risk of large legal fees. Other cases that reach court might be those that raise novel or complex points of law that require a judicial opinion.

The reality is that most cases we, and other family lawyers handle are resolved privately between the parties. Solicitors on both sides use previous court decisions to inform their advice to you about what you should seek in terms of a financial settlement. This includes guidance on the circumstances in which a court might order a 50:50 split and those when it might not.

What If We Can’t Agree How TO Divide Assets?

If there is no agreement the court will decide the terms of a financial settlement. Decisions will first and foremost be based on the principle of fairness we’ve mentioned. The courts will consider:

  • The income, earning capacity, property and other financial resources of each spouse or civil partner
  • The financial obligations each of the parties to the marriage has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future
  • The standard of living enjoyed by the family before the breakdown of the marriage
  • The age of each party
  • The duration of the marriage
  • Any physical or mental disability of either of the parties to the marriage
  • The contributions which each of the parties has made or is likely in the foreseeable future to make to the welfare of the family

Note that where there are young children, the court’s first concern will always be their welfare and how their needs will be met.

Does The Length Of My Marriage Matter When Dividing Assets?

One of the factors listed above is duration of the marriage. When it comes to splitting assets, the length of your marriage can be crucial in determining whether assets will be split equally or not. A 50:50 split is more likely when there has been a long marriage, and the resources are sufficient to meet the needs of the family. Where there is a short, childless marriage of, say, less than two years the courts are less likely to order a 50:50 split.

P v Q (2022) – When Assets Are Divided Equally

The way a long marriage can dictate asset division was demonstrated in the 2022 case of P v Q. There, the matrimonial pot of assets was about £6million, two thirds of which was tied up in a company in which both husband and wife were involved. Both parties argued that they should each receive approximately 60% of the available assets (as opposed to 50%). The wife argued that the husband continued to receive a substantial salary from the company (she did not). The husband on the other hand argued that post-divorce the wife would have the advantage of controlling most of the marital property (the capital assets like property). He on the other hand would still be largely reliant on the potentially unpredictable performance of a company.

The judge indicated that in a long marriage like this – where there were no issues of conduct or disability to consider – then as a starting point in the division of assets – fairness and equality (a 50:50 split) ‘usually ride hand in hand’. Referring to an earlier case he confirmed that as a general guide, equality should be departed from only if, and to the extent that, there is good reason for doing so.

In the circumstances of this case the arguments made by both husband and wife to deviate from an equal split had the effect of cancelling each other out. As a result, a split of more or less 50:50 was ordered.

Got a question? Ask us now…

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

I had applied for a free consultation and I was contacted in a very short timeframe. Thank you so much for the insightful and thorough consultation, Kevin Danagher. You made me feel at ease and you provided clear expectations with the initial info I had provided... I have now a much better understanding on my query.

Feb 2024   Sonia Accardi

We had a very useful first consultation with Amber Matheson today. Amber took the time to understand our (somewhat complicated) set-up, and offered good, understandable advice on next steps. She followed up with a very thorough email clarifying what we had discussed. Highly recommended.

Feb 2024   Lucie

Lovely friendly experience. All questions were answered so that I understood completely.

Dec 2023   Ali Catlin

Very balanced, fair and pragmatic advice. Thoroughly recommend!!

Nov 2023   James Elliott

Henry graciously provided his time for a consultation. I found him to be highly knowledgeable, empathetic and he provided excellent advice which put my mind at ease. Would highly recommend Henry and his firm.

Oct 2023   Allan Ang

Henry Brookman went above and beyond during the free consultation, and even overran the allocated time. He provided invaluable professional advice in a courteous manner. I recommend his firm without reservation.

Sep 2023   Mario Ignatov

I only had my initial free review with Amelia yet I already feel much more strengthened in my legal and financial position. I am currently reflecting on the steps I want to take to negotiate my desired outcome of the financial settlement but, when I am ready to use the services of a lawyer, Amelia is definitely the top on my list.

Sep 2023   Nahid Toubia

I had a zoom consultation with Lauren Moir and she was incredible. Very patient, insightful and reassuring. She also advised me based on my previous conversations with another firm and also clarified various positions I am in. Highly recommend.

Aug 2023   Gary Hawes

I was very impressed with the friendly, helpful and professional service offered by Brookman Solicitors. The generous advice and knowledge offered during the initial free consultation has enabled us to have a much better understanding of our case and plan a way forward.

Jul 2023   Peter Jackson

I had a first consultation with Kevin, who very diligently and professionally provided an exhaustive overview of the divorce process and the best approach for my specific case.

Jul 2023   Giulia Matteo

Great service and excellent advice at the initial consultation. I would certainly recommend and use in the future.

Jul 2023   Tom James

Spoke to a kind solicitor this morning who took an hour of her time to talk me through some advice relating to a difficult separation.... She was clear and helpful with her advice, leaving me feeling much more confident with the process ahead of me.

Jun 2023   Luke Taylor

Mr Brookman provided very clear advice that left me with no doubt about the options and next steps. Getting specific advice with the requirements in the different jurisdictions was particularly useful so I won’t need to consult another lawyer outside of the UK

May 2023   Julian Anthony

From initial contact I found all staff extremely helpful and professional. My options were made clear, my query was dealt with in a sympathetic way. Would highly recommend Brookman Solicitors.

Mar 2023   seamus mcguinness

The initial consultation I have just completed with Henry Brookman was very informative; he was very open and honest about my situation, the legalities of the matter and the extent of how his firm could help.

Nov 2022   Kimberley Noakes

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 8470