occupation-order

An occupation order is one of several remedies available under Part IV of the Family Law Act, 1996. The orders – which may be granted irrespective of the gender of the applicant – are designed to protect individuals and children from harmful situations, including actual or threatened domestic violence.

In the context of divorce and separation the order is an essential tool when:

  • One party (the applicant) wishes another (the respondent) to stay away from a shared home
  • Where an applicant wishes to assert his or her right to remain in a property from which they have been excluded

Typically, occupation orders lay down who is permitted to live in a particular property and who is excluded. They might also contain provisions about property maintenance and mortgage payments. Sometimes judges will consider simultaneously imposing a non-molestation order against a spouse or partner.

Occupation orders do not have any effect on the legal ownership of the property. Although usually in place for a specified period of time only, these orders will have a significant impact on the individuals affected.  As a result the courts do not make them lightly.

Who can apply for an occupation order?

A successful application will depend on a number of factors. These include the entitlement of the applicant to live in the property and his or her relationship with the respondent.

You must clear a number of hurdles before obtaining an occupation order. First, you need to show you are in some way ‘associated’ with the respondent. Secondly you must demonstrate a connection to the property to which any order will relate. Thirdly you must satisfy the so-called ‘balance of harm’ test.

If you are unable to satisfy that harm will occur if an order is not made, the court may, in its discretion apply ‘core criteria’ to your case and still make an occupation order.

We will look at each of these elements in turn.

1.         ‘Associated person’

The rules state that you can only apply for an occupation order in respect of someone else if you are ‘associated’ with him or her. This means you:

  • Are or were married
  • You are or used to be cohabitees
  • You lived together and were not simply tenants or lodgers
  • Are related to each other
  • Have agreed to marry each other

2.         Connection to the property

Once an association is established it is essential to demonstrate that you have some kind of connection to the property to which any order is going to relate. For example, you are a tenant or an owner, you are married to or in a civil partnership with a tenant or owner or you were previously married to or in a civil partnership with the tenant or owner.

3.         The balance of harm

The family judge must consider if the applicant or any child is likely to suffer significant harm because of the behaviour of the respondent. If he or she decides that significant harm will occur he or she should make an order unless:

  • There would be significant harm to the respondent or child if the order is made
  • There would be equal or greater harm to the respondent or child if the order is not made

4.         Core criteria and the court’s discretion

If the balance of harm test is not satisfied the court can still use its discretion in favour of granting an order. To do this it will consider the ‘core criteria’ set out in the legislation. These are:

  • The housing needs of the parties and children
  • The financial resources of the parties
  • The likely effect of any order or decision not to make an order on the health or well-being of the parties and any children
  • The conduct of the parties

We provide advice to both applicants and respondents on all aspects of occupation orders, related non-molestation orders and other family law disputes. You can enquire online or call us in confidence on + 44 (0) 20 7430 8470.

Got a question? Ask us now…

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

I had a 30-minute consultation with Samantha Jago where she clearly explained all my options and followed up with a detailed email of notes. I would highly recommend if you need help to clarify where you stand and getting options for how you move forward.

Jun 2024   Katherine Davey

I recently had a one hour pro bono consultation with Samantha Jago. I was really blown away by how much she was able to digest in such a short period of time and even more so by the report which I received shortly after.

Apr 2024   S DF

I had applied for a free consultation and I was contacted in a very short timeframe. Thank you so much for the insightful and thorough consultation, Kevin Danagher. You made me feel at ease and you provided clear expectations with the initial info I had provided... I have now a much better understanding on my query.

Feb 2024   Sonia Accardi

We had a very useful first consultation with Amber Matheson today. Amber took the time to understand our (somewhat complicated) set-up, and offered good, understandable advice on next steps. She followed up with a very thorough email clarifying what we had discussed. Highly recommended.

Feb 2024   Lucie

Lovely friendly experience. All questions were answered so that I understood completely.

Dec 2023   Ali Catlin

Very balanced, fair and pragmatic advice. Thoroughly recommend!!

Nov 2023   James Elliott

Henry graciously provided his time for a consultation. I found him to be highly knowledgeable, empathetic and he provided excellent advice which put my mind at ease. Would highly recommend Henry and his firm.

Oct 2023   Allan Ang

Henry Brookman went above and beyond during the free consultation, and even overran the allocated time. He provided invaluable professional advice in a courteous manner. I recommend his firm without reservation.

Sep 2023   Mario Ignatov

I only had my initial free review with Amelia yet I already feel much more strengthened in my legal and financial position. I am currently reflecting on the steps I want to take to negotiate my desired outcome of the financial settlement but, when I am ready to use the services of a lawyer, Amelia is definitely the top on my list.

Sep 2023   Nahid Toubia

I had a zoom consultation with Lauren Moir and she was incredible. Very patient, insightful and reassuring. She also advised me based on my previous conversations with another firm and also clarified various positions I am in. Highly recommend.

Aug 2023   Gary Hawes

I was very impressed with the friendly, helpful and professional service offered by Brookman Solicitors. The generous advice and knowledge offered during the initial free consultation has enabled us to have a much better understanding of our case and plan a way forward.

Jul 2023   Peter Jackson

I had a first consultation with Kevin, who very diligently and professionally provided an exhaustive overview of the divorce process and the best approach for my specific case.

Jul 2023   Giulia Matteo

Great service and excellent advice at the initial consultation. I would certainly recommend and use in the future.

Jul 2023   Tom James

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 8470