The short answer is yes. But what might seem like a financial saving at the time could cost you more in the long run. Divorce, including the financial aspects, is a complex legal process. Individuals who represent themselves will often be at a disadvantage compared with a spouse who is represented by a family law solicitor or barrister. And just because you represent yourself does not mean it’s any easier to appeal the terms of an unsatisfactory settlement or court order than if you had obtained legal advice.

Why Do Some People Represent Themselves?

Of course many people going through a divorce don’t have any choice about legal representation. They simply can’t afford it. And in recent years there has been a significant increase in the number of people who represent themselves in divorce proceedings (‘litigants in person’).  This is in part down to a recent reduction in the legal aid budget that has resulted in very few divorcing couples being eligible for financial assistance for legal representation in family cases.

The country’s most senior family law judge, Sir Andrew McFarlane has warned recently that the influx of “litigants in person” has on occasion exposed district judges to the fury of unrepresented and “emotionally charged” claimants. He indicated that the number of cases reaching the family courts has, for no discernible reason, increased substantially since 2016 and there are no indications of a leveling off in the volume of disputes.

It’s also worth pointing out that the amount of litigants in person is not just down to legal aid cuts. At Brookman Solicitors in London we often see instances where there are substantial matrimonial assets but one party is forced to represent themselves because they have no access to funds to pay for legal fees up front. We therefore discuss possible financing options below.

How Do Judges Treat Litigants In Person?

We are aware of situations where highly experienced lawyers represent one party while the other represents him or herself. In such cases the judge must strike a balance. On the one hand he or she must ensure the process is fair. On the other the judge can’t be seen to become involved in the case in a way that might be interpreted as unfairly favouring the unrepresented party.

Crowther v Crowther

This tension has been demonstrated recently by the Court of Appeal decision in Crowther v Crowther. There, at the contested financial hearing in the District court the husband was represented by an experienced barrister while the wife represented herself. When it came to the wife’s turn to question her husband the judge indicated that he wished to raise some matters with the husband first. He then questioned the husband in some detail before indicating that the wife could ask her own questions.

During his questioning the judge raised an issue about the husband’s ability to live on his own (the husband was physically disabled and vulnerable from a mental health perspective). His future accommodation requirements would clearly have a bearing on the final financial settlement. In its decision the Court of Appeal found that the judge’s questioning along these lines was unfair to the husband. The future living arrangements issue had never been part of the wife’s case so the husband had no prior warning that the issue would be raised. He therefore had no opportunity to present arguments in relation to it.

The case is now going to be reheard in full.

In an interesting remark the Court of Appeal summed up the delicate position of judges in cases where litigants in person appear as follows:

“..the requirement for the court to achieve a fair process by assisting the litigant in person almost inevitably draws the judge into the role of inquisitor, albeit on behalf of the litigant. It is a difficult line to tread..”

How We Can Help

We’ve worked in the family and divorce arena for long enough to appreciate the financial demands the divorce process can place on finances – even in relatively well off households. Many people come to us with concerns about paying for legal advice and in our view it is always best to get the best legal advice possible. Paying for sub standard advice or representing yourself can end up costing more because of the poor settlement you end up with. While you may be given some leeway by a judge in the course of a hearing this will be very limited as the Crowther case referred to above illustrates.

If you don’t have available funds you could consider a short-term loan from friends or family or your solicitor may be willing to enter into a Sears Tooth agreement where a proportion of your final settlement is set aside to meet legal fees.

Got a question? Ask us now…

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

Today I had my free initial consultation with partner Henry Brookman over the phone. He had a clear understanding of my situation based on the info I provided in advance and provided me with sound advice and guidance to move forward. Many thanks.

Aug 2022   H. J.

Really appreciated Brookman's advice and support. Most lawyers charge extortionate fees just for an initial conversation but not Henry. Thanks for all your advice and time.

Jul 2022   Chloé

I had a consultation with the partner Henry Brookman. I can absolutely recommend him, he seemed knowledgeable, up to date and patient. I have found him to be straightforward in the answers he gives and down to earth. 100% recommended.

Jun 2022   Michael P

I have no hesitation whatsoever in recommending Henry Brookman. His advice came in promptly when solicited, and was excellent. He is a thoughtful and very professional lawyer. He understood perfectly well the issue I presented him with, and gave me excellent advice in a family law related matter.

May 2022   Philip Hands

From my first contact with the firm I was treated courteously and promptly. I was offered a pro bono meeting shortly after making contact. Mr Brookman is clearly a very experienced professional and in our meeting he gave me some well considered and objective advice about my rather complicated situation which spans more than one jurisdiction.

May 2022   Julian Peachey

I had an initial consultation with Henry Brookman regarding prenuptial agreements and found him to be very helpful and knowledgeable.

Mar 2022   Simon Brooks

I had a free telephone consultation yesterday with Gavin Yeung. He could not have been more helpful and reassuring as he calmly and patiently worked through my situation to provide me with clarity and piece of mind at a time it was really needed and emotions are running high.

Mar 2022   'K M'

I spoke with Aziz at Brookman Solicitors on the phone for an initial consultation and he is one of the friendliest lawyers I have met. He is clearly very experienced as he patiently explained me all the concepts and processes which are quite daunting for someone in my situation, and then focused on the actual questions I wanted to ask... I would highly recommend Aziz and Brookman Solicitors.

Feb 2022   'R'

I am grateful for Henry Brookman and his team for support they provided to me during very frustrating time of divorce. They respond promptly to any request. I felt more confident after I started the process with them. Henry listened carefully to me and took quick actions on my case. I highly recommend this team of real professionals even for non-UK citizens.

Feb 2022   Sezim Beksultanova

I had online consultation with the partner Henry Brookman today. I was very happy with the service. I found him to be very insightful, knowledgeable and provided sound advice, as well as being kind and patient. It was a very comfortable discussion and he sent an email detailing our discussion very quickly discussing in our meeting in depth. I am amazed by the service we got just from a free consultation. I would highly recommend these solicitors!

Jan 2022   Shirley Christopher

We spoke at length and at no point felt like he was rushing us and we felt very comfortable. After our discussion we were also quickly sent an email detailing everything we were discussing in our meeting in depth. I am amazed by the service we got just from a free consultation. I would highly recommend these solicitors!

Dec 2021   Tina

I was fortunate to spend an hour running through a few questions with Natasha Slabas. She was quick to grasp the points raised and proposed a sensible way forward. Would recommend

Dec 2021   Nick Powell

I cannot praise the professionalism and courtesy too highly. The advice given in a very complex divorce matter, was clear, concise, enlightening and inspiring.

Nov 2021   Mary Barn

I contacted Henry Brookman because of the complex international aspect of my divorce and I’m very glad I did... Henry took his time explaining all the pro’s and contra’s... I now have a much clearer view over the situation and feel more confident going forward. I’m very grateful for the excellent advice I’ve received and not feeling rushed during the meeting.

Nov 2021   'A B'

Talitha offers sound advice, asks the right questions and advises you with what you need to know not just what you want to hear. I have no hesitation in recommending her services.

Sep 2021   Anu Vidyarthi

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 8470