Spending before divorce

It’s a well-worn divorce cliché. An aggrieved spouse starts to empty joint accounts and spend his or her savings to stop the other benefitting from the money in an imminent divorce settlement. We have already seen that full financial disclosure is required in divorce proceedings. And we have also looked at what happens when one spouse hides assets. But in practice – can someone really get away with reckless spending ahead of a divorce?

Reckless spending and conduct

When deciding on what financial settlement to make the courts use the factors set out in the Matrimonial Causes Act, 1973. These same points are used by us as divorce solicitors when negotiating an out of court financial settlement.

The Act says all the facts of the case should be considered, including

the conduct of each of the parties, if that conduct is such that it would in the opinion of the court be inequitable to disregard it.

Non-financial conduct must be extreme in nature if it is to be a factor in the settlement. As for financial behaviour such as reckless spending, this can in theory be used to justify ‘adding back’ the money that has been wasted. For spouses who believe their estranged husband or wife is intentionally reducing assets, a word of warning: Courts have been clear that they will only carry out the adding back exercise very cautiously. There must be clear evidence of what has been called ‘wanton dissipation’

MAP v MFP and the ‘Flawed Individual’

In the past, recovering some or all the amount wasted by one spouse was easier to achieve than it is now. The 2015 case of MAP v MFP has, many commentators believe, made adding back much more difficult. That’s largely due to a recognition by judges that seemingly reckless behaviour may be down to the flawed character of an individual.

To bring a successful claim to add back the notional amount that matrimonial property has allegedly been dissipated by, a spouse must demonstrate that:

  • the behaviour that led to the reduction in assets was reckless and wanton; and
  • the motivation for the spending was to reduce a financial claim.

In MAP v MFP the husband spent a large sum of money (in the hundreds of thousands) following separation from his wife of 40 years. The money was used to pay for drugs, escorts and stints in rehab. The wife asked the court to have the sums taken into account when deciding on the financial settlement. The court refused, finding that the husband did not overspend with the intention of reducing the wife’s claim. His spending was, said the judge, down to his ‘flawed character’ and the wife should ‘take her husband as she found him’. The husband’s behaviour might have been irresponsible but it did not amount to deliberate or wanton dissipation. As a result the judge decided it would be wrong to add it back.

Can I prevent a spouse’s overspending?

In the highly emotional context of a bitter divorce it is tempting to let apparent misuse of funds by one spouse cloud your judgment. But rushing to litigate because of this is rarely the right course of action. If you do think there is a risk of asset dissipation you should seek legal advice as a matter of urgency.

If attempting to get amounts of money or the value of assets added back when calculating a settlement you should, for the reasons outlined above proceed with caution. Remember:

  • courts will only agree to your claim in very limited circumstances where assets are greater than the financial needs of the parties
  • they are unlikely to consider an add back if it will only make a small difference to your settlement
  • you must have very clear proof of deliberate or reckless asset dissipation
  • the overspending must be motivated by a desire to reduce your financial claim
  • adding back must be fair having regard to all the circumstances of the case

There are also remedies available such as freezing orders and other types of injunction that can reduce the risk. But they must be sought before assets become impossible to trace. Again you should seek specialist legal advice at the earliest opportunity.

In appropriate cases and following specialist advice a claim for add back may be worth it. But there is always a risk that you will spend more in legal costs trying to achieve the desired outcome. This is particularly the case if the court ultimately makes no order for costs . In those circumstances you would be unable to claw back your legal costs of the application from your spouse.

Got a question? Ask us now…

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

Today I had my free initial consultation with partner Henry Brookman over the phone. He had a clear understanding of my situation based on the info I provided in advance and provided me with sound advice and guidance to move forward. Many thanks.

Aug 2022   H. J.

Really appreciated Brookman's advice and support. Most lawyers charge extortionate fees just for an initial conversation but not Henry. Thanks for all your advice and time.

Jul 2022   Chloé

I had a consultation with the partner Henry Brookman. I can absolutely recommend him, he seemed knowledgeable, up to date and patient. I have found him to be straightforward in the answers he gives and down to earth. 100% recommended.

Jun 2022   Michael P

I have no hesitation whatsoever in recommending Henry Brookman. His advice came in promptly when solicited, and was excellent. He is a thoughtful and very professional lawyer. He understood perfectly well the issue I presented him with, and gave me excellent advice in a family law related matter.

May 2022   Philip Hands

From my first contact with the firm I was treated courteously and promptly. I was offered a pro bono meeting shortly after making contact. Mr Brookman is clearly a very experienced professional and in our meeting he gave me some well considered and objective advice about my rather complicated situation which spans more than one jurisdiction.

May 2022   Julian Peachey

I had an initial consultation with Henry Brookman regarding prenuptial agreements and found him to be very helpful and knowledgeable.

Mar 2022   Simon Brooks

I had a free telephone consultation yesterday with Gavin Yeung. He could not have been more helpful and reassuring as he calmly and patiently worked through my situation to provide me with clarity and piece of mind at a time it was really needed and emotions are running high.

Mar 2022   'K M'

I spoke with Aziz at Brookman Solicitors on the phone for an initial consultation and he is one of the friendliest lawyers I have met. He is clearly very experienced as he patiently explained me all the concepts and processes which are quite daunting for someone in my situation, and then focused on the actual questions I wanted to ask... I would highly recommend Aziz and Brookman Solicitors.

Feb 2022   'R'

I am grateful for Henry Brookman and his team for support they provided to me during very frustrating time of divorce. They respond promptly to any request. I felt more confident after I started the process with them. Henry listened carefully to me and took quick actions on my case. I highly recommend this team of real professionals even for non-UK citizens.

Feb 2022   Sezim Beksultanova

I had online consultation with the partner Henry Brookman today. I was very happy with the service. I found him to be very insightful, knowledgeable and provided sound advice, as well as being kind and patient. It was a very comfortable discussion and he sent an email detailing our discussion very quickly discussing in our meeting in depth. I am amazed by the service we got just from a free consultation. I would highly recommend these solicitors!

Jan 2022   Shirley Christopher

We spoke at length and at no point felt like he was rushing us and we felt very comfortable. After our discussion we were also quickly sent an email detailing everything we were discussing in our meeting in depth. I am amazed by the service we got just from a free consultation. I would highly recommend these solicitors!

Dec 2021   Tina

I was fortunate to spend an hour running through a few questions with Natasha Slabas. She was quick to grasp the points raised and proposed a sensible way forward. Would recommend

Dec 2021   Nick Powell

I cannot praise the professionalism and courtesy too highly. The advice given in a very complex divorce matter, was clear, concise, enlightening and inspiring.

Nov 2021   Mary Barn

I contacted Henry Brookman because of the complex international aspect of my divorce and I’m very glad I did... Henry took his time explaining all the pro’s and contra’s... I now have a much clearer view over the situation and feel more confident going forward. I’m very grateful for the excellent advice I’ve received and not feeling rushed during the meeting.

Nov 2021   'A B'

Talitha offers sound advice, asks the right questions and advises you with what you need to know not just what you want to hear. I have no hesitation in recommending her services.

Sep 2021   Anu Vidyarthi

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 8470