Spending before divorce

It’s a well-worn divorce cliché. An aggrieved spouse starts to empty joint accounts and spend his or her savings to stop the other benefitting from the money in an imminent divorce settlement. We have already seen that full financial disclosure is required in divorce proceedings. And we have also looked at what happens when one spouse hides assets. But in practice – can someone really get away with reckless spending ahead of a divorce?

Reckless spending and conduct

When deciding on what financial settlement to make the courts use the factors set out in the Matrimonial Causes Act, 1973. These same points are used by us as divorce solicitors when negotiating an out of court financial settlement.

The Act says all the facts of the case should be considered, including

the conduct of each of the parties, if that conduct is such that it would in the opinion of the court be inequitable to disregard it.

Non-financial conduct must be extreme in nature if it is to be a factor in the settlement. As for financial behaviour such as reckless spending, this can in theory be used to justify ‘adding back’ the money that has been wasted. For spouses who believe their estranged husband or wife is intentionally reducing assets, a word of warning: Courts have been clear that they will only carry out the adding back exercise very cautiously. There must be clear evidence of what has been called ‘wanton dissipation’

MAP v MFP and the ‘Flawed Individual’

In the past, recovering some or all the amount wasted by one spouse was easier to achieve than it is now. The 2015 case of MAP v MFP has, many commentators believe, made adding back much more difficult. That’s largely due to a recognition by judges that seemingly reckless behaviour may be down to the flawed character of an individual.

To bring a successful claim to add back the notional amount that matrimonial property has allegedly been dissipated by, a spouse must demonstrate that:

  • the behaviour that led to the reduction in assets was reckless and wanton; and
  • the motivation for the spending was to reduce a financial claim.

In MAP v MFP the husband spent a large sum of money (in the hundreds of thousands) following separation from his wife of 40 years. The money was used to pay for drugs, escorts and stints in rehab. The wife asked the court to have the sums taken into account when deciding on the financial settlement. The court refused, finding that the husband did not overspend with the intention of reducing the wife’s claim. His spending was, said the judge, down to his ‘flawed character’ and the wife should ‘take her husband as she found him’. The husband’s behaviour might have been irresponsible but it did not amount to deliberate or wanton dissipation. As a result the judge decided it would be wrong to add it back.

Can I prevent a spouse’s overspending?

In the highly emotional context of a bitter divorce it is tempting to let apparent misuse of funds by one spouse cloud your judgment. But rushing to litigate because of this is rarely the right course of action. If you do think there is a risk of asset dissipation you should seek legal advice as a matter of urgency.

If attempting to get amounts of money or the value of assets added back when calculating a settlement you should, for the reasons outlined above proceed with caution. Remember:

  • courts will only agree to your claim in very limited circumstances where assets are greater than the financial needs of the parties
  • they are unlikely to consider an add back if it will only make a small difference to your settlement
  • you must have very clear proof of deliberate or reckless asset dissipation
  • the overspending must be motivated by a desire to reduce your financial claim
  • adding back must be fair having regard to all the circumstances of the case

There are also remedies available such as freezing orders and other types of injunction that can reduce the risk. But they must be sought before assets become impossible to trace. Again you should seek specialist legal advice at the earliest opportunity.

In appropriate cases and following specialist advice a claim for add back may be worth it. But there is always a risk that you will spend more in legal costs trying to achieve the desired outcome. This is particularly the case if the court ultimately makes no order for costs . In those circumstances you would be unable to claw back your legal costs of the application from your spouse.

Got a question? Ask us now…

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

I had a 30-minute consultation with Samantha Jago where she clearly explained all my options and followed up with a detailed email of notes. I would highly recommend if you need help to clarify where you stand and getting options for how you move forward.

Jun 2024   Katherine Davey

I recently had a one hour pro bono consultation with Samantha Jago. I was really blown away by how much she was able to digest in such a short period of time and even more so by the report which I received shortly after.

Apr 2024   S DF

I had applied for a free consultation and I was contacted in a very short timeframe. Thank you so much for the insightful and thorough consultation, Kevin Danagher. You made me feel at ease and you provided clear expectations with the initial info I had provided... I have now a much better understanding on my query.

Feb 2024   Sonia Accardi

We had a very useful first consultation with Amber Matheson today. Amber took the time to understand our (somewhat complicated) set-up, and offered good, understandable advice on next steps. She followed up with a very thorough email clarifying what we had discussed. Highly recommended.

Feb 2024   Lucie

Lovely friendly experience. All questions were answered so that I understood completely.

Dec 2023   Ali Catlin

Very balanced, fair and pragmatic advice. Thoroughly recommend!!

Nov 2023   James Elliott

Henry graciously provided his time for a consultation. I found him to be highly knowledgeable, empathetic and he provided excellent advice which put my mind at ease. Would highly recommend Henry and his firm.

Oct 2023   Allan Ang

Henry Brookman went above and beyond during the free consultation, and even overran the allocated time. He provided invaluable professional advice in a courteous manner. I recommend his firm without reservation.

Sep 2023   Mario Ignatov

I only had my initial free review with Amelia yet I already feel much more strengthened in my legal and financial position. I am currently reflecting on the steps I want to take to negotiate my desired outcome of the financial settlement but, when I am ready to use the services of a lawyer, Amelia is definitely the top on my list.

Sep 2023   Nahid Toubia

I had a zoom consultation with Lauren Moir and she was incredible. Very patient, insightful and reassuring. She also advised me based on my previous conversations with another firm and also clarified various positions I am in. Highly recommend.

Aug 2023   Gary Hawes

I was very impressed with the friendly, helpful and professional service offered by Brookman Solicitors. The generous advice and knowledge offered during the initial free consultation has enabled us to have a much better understanding of our case and plan a way forward.

Jul 2023   Peter Jackson

I had a first consultation with Kevin, who very diligently and professionally provided an exhaustive overview of the divorce process and the best approach for my specific case.

Jul 2023   Giulia Matteo

Great service and excellent advice at the initial consultation. I would certainly recommend and use in the future.

Jul 2023   Tom James

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 8470