Latest: Brookman Solicitors announces expansion of its legal services following merger with DMH Stallard. Read more

Prenuptial agreements play a role in a significant number of divorces in England and Wales. Since the 2010 Supreme Court decision in Radmacher v Granatino the stature of this type of agreement has been greatly enhanced.

However, the groundbreaking Radmacher case doesn’t mean the terms of a prenup will always dictate how finances are divided on divorce. That’s to say there are circumstances in which courts will decide that applying the provisions of a prenup aren’t a valid way to reach a financial settlement.  In interpreting prenups courts will consider the following:

  • Has the agreement been entered into freely?
  • Did both sides understand fully the financial implications?
  • In the circumstances, is it fair to hold the parties to the agreement?

Did one party sign the prenup under duress?

It’s fundamental to any contractual arrangement that the parties agree freely to the terms. When one party feels cornered into accepting the terms of a prenup he or she may argue that it is invalid.

Duress might occur when, for example one party refuses to marry until the agreement is signed. Courts will often insist that a prenup – to be valid – should be executed well in advance of a marriage ceremony (a period of 21 days is usually deemed sufficient to remove any suggestion of duress).

Other factors that can undermine the validity of a prenup include misrepresentation, undue influence or mistake as to the terms of the agreement. In general where there is a question mark over a party’s free will or the information relied on before entering the agreement the validity of a prenup could feasibly be challenged.

Were the financial implications of the prenup fully understood?

Unless there is complete transparency about each parties’ assets a prenup will be open to challenge. It’s always advisable for both sides to obtain independent legal advice so that an understanding of the legal and financial implications of the agreement be firmly established.

Is it fair to follow the terms of the prenup?

A prenuptial agreement can never subvert existing legislation – judges must still consider all relevant circumstances of the case when deciding on a financial settlement (Matrimonial Causes Act, 1973). In looking at whether or not a prenup results in a settlement that is fair to the parties the courts will consider several factors, including:

  • The income, earning capacity, propertyand other financial resources each party to the marriage has or is likely to have in the future
  • The financial needs, obligations and responsibilitieswhich each of the parties to the marriage has or is likely to have in the foreseeable future
  • The standard of livingenjoyed by the family before the breakdown of the marriage
  • The conductof each of the parties if that conduct us such that it would, in the opinion of the Court, be unfair to disregard it

A prenup that prevented a spouse applying for financial relief through the courts and asking for the above factors to be applied would be invalid.

Case study S v H

All of these issues were considered in the case of S v H  (2020). There a prenup was signed without any independent legal advice just five days ahead of the marriage. When the marriage ended, the husband – who was bankrupt – asked the courts to implement the terms of the agreement. The wife sought to activate the terms of the prenup as part of her financial relief claim. In the circumstances the judge ruled that the prenup was invalid because:

  • There was no legal advice,
  • The parties had not disclosed one another’s assets to each other
  • The agreement didn’t meet the needs of the husband

As a result the court ordered the wife to pay £675,000 to the husband and provide accommodation for his lifetime. The husband also received 60% of the wife’s pension.

Comment

Ordinarily a judge will attach considerable weight to a prenuptial agreement provided the conditions we’ve described have been met. Independent legal advice and full disclosure of assets is always essential. In addition, as the case of S v H demonstrates, a prenup can’t stop a spouse in dire financial straits applying to the courts for financial relief, irrespective of the terms of the agreement.

Got a question? Ask us now…

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

Very swift response and concise information. I had a very engaging free consultation with Mr Brookman initially which was informative and professional.

Feb 2021   Garry Ralph

I would like to say my experience with Mr Brookman was an extremely positive experience. His knowledge, advice and compassion put me very much at ease and made a very difficult situation much more bearable.

Feb 2021   Jenny Brock

Very helpful, and honest about my situation even though it wasn’t business for them at this time. Would recommend.

Jan 2021   Natalie Roche

Knowledgable, friendly, considerate, and most importantly easy to contact. Brilliant service.

Dec 2020   John Du

I want to highly commend Brookman Solicitors firm. I had the privilege of getting very thorough and sensible advice from their solicitor Jennifer Douglas. I don't have enough praise for her.

Sep 2020   Yesima Hamid

I had an initial consultation and Henry was well prepared. He gave great advice and followed through quite quickly. He was very helpful.

Jul 2020   Jen Ade

I had a free consultation with Henry Brookman. He was incredibly knowledgeable about my complex situation, gave straightforward advice and empowered me to understand exactly how I need to proceed.

Jun 2020   Rebeca Brown

Henry was extremely helpful and pleasant to speak with. He provided comprehensive advice in a matter of hours and responded promptly to any queries I had.

Jun 2020   Sarah Jones

Excellent service. I had a consultation directly with Mr Brookman and his advice and guidance was very clear and helpful. Would highly recommend.

Mar 2020   Jamie Warnes

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 4870