A joint application for divorce can give the impression that both spouses are working together and approaching the end of the marriage constructively. However, this may not always be the best option. In some circumstances, applying as a sole applicant can provide greater certainty and avoid unnecessary delays.
Choosing between a sole or joint divorce application is one of the first decisions separating couples must make. While the choice does not determine how assets will be divided or what arrangements are made for children, it can affect the practical management of the divorce process and dictate how smoothly matters progress.
Understanding sole and joint divorce applications
Since the introduction of no-fault divorce in April 2022, spouses no longer need to blame one another for the breakdown of the marriage. Instead, they simply state that the marriage has irretrievably broken down.
There are now two ways to start proceedings:
- A sole application, where one spouse begins the divorce process alone
- A joint application, where both spouses apply together
Neither option gives one party a greater entitlement to assets, a stronger position regarding children, or any advantage when the court considers financial matters. Rather, the choice is more about practicality and the level of cooperation between the parties.
What is a sole divorce application?
A sole application is made by one spouse, known as the applicant. The other spouse becomes the respondent. The applicant completes the online application, and the court formally serves the papers on the respondent who then acknowledges receipt.
Many people assume that a sole application indicates hostility or conflict. But often, couples who remain on good terms choose this route simply because one person is taking responsibility for the administration of the divorce.
For example, a husband and wife may have already agreed to separate amicably and reached a broad understanding regarding finances. One spouse may decide to deal with the paperwork because the other is busy, overseas, or simply prefers not to manage legal documents.
What is a joint application?
A joint application allows both spouses to commence proceedings together, where they are referred to as Applicant 1 and Applicant 2 rather than applicant and respondent. Throughout the proceedings, each party must actively participate, and certain stages require confirmation from both spouses before the case can move forward.
For many couples, this shared approach reflects the cooperative way they have decided to end their marriage.
Why the choice matters
Although both routes ultimately lead to the same divorce order, there are practical differences. The level of communication between spouses is often the most important consideration.
Where parties are speaking regularly and can work together, a joint application may proceed smoothly. However, if communication deteriorates or one spouse becomes unresponsive, the process can become frustrating.
A sole application provides more control because one party can continue progressing the divorce without depending on the other person’s cooperation beyond acknowledging service.
Advantages of a joint application
One advantage is that neither party appears to be initiating proceedings against the other. Some people find this approach less confrontational and believe it sets a more constructive tone for discussions about finances and children.
Joint applications can also show that both spouses accept the marriage has ended and are committed to moving forward. Another benefit is that responsibilities are shared, and rather than one person managing everything, both parties remain involved throughout the process.
For example, a couple who have been separated for two years and have already agreed arrangements for their children may decide to submit a joint application as part of an amicable separation.
Potential disadvantages of a joint application
Although joint applications work well for many families, they rely heavily upon ongoing cooperation. Relationships that are initially amicable can become strained once financial issues are discussed and disputes emerge over the family home, pensions or maintenance.
If one spouse fails to complete the required stages or simply becomes disengaged, delays can arise, and administrative problems occur. A party may change email addresses, move abroad or stop responding to messages. Since both spouses need to participate at various stages, this can stall the application.
A couple may begin the process together with the best intentions, only for one spouse to lose interest or become reluctant to proceed. This can create uncertainty and additional stress for the more proactive spouse.
Advantages of a sole application
The applicant does not need to rely upon the other party to actively manage the case, which makes the process simpler and more predictable.
Where communication between spouses is limited, a sole application often proves more practical. For instance, a wife whose husband works overseas and is difficult to contact may prefer to proceed as a sole applicant. Similarly, where one spouse tends to avoid dealing with paperwork, relying on a joint application could lead to unnecessary delays.
Another advantage is that the process can continue even if dealings between the former couple deteriorate. It is common for couples to separate amicably only to discover that negotiations over finances become contentious. A sole application avoids the risk that disagreements elsewhere will disrupt the divorce itself.
Does the choice affect financial settlements?
Whether the divorce began as a sole application or a joint application has no bearing on the division of assets. The court will still consider the same factors when determining a financial settlement, which include things such as the parties’ income, earning capacity, housing needs, contributions, and the welfare of any children.
A spouse who applies jointly does not receive a larger share of assets, and a sole applicant does not gain priority over the family home or pensions. Financial negotiations remain entirely separate from the method used to start the divorce.
Does it affect child arrangements?
The courts focus upon the welfare of the children rather than the form of the divorce application. Parents who submit a joint application are not viewed more favourably, nor are sole applicants disadvantaged.
Child arrangements are determined according to what is in the child’s best interests. Matters such as schooling, living arrangements, and contact with each parent are considered independently from the divorce process itself.
Which option is right?
For couples who communicate well and remain committed to working together, a joint application may reflect the cooperative nature of their separation. However, it should not be assumed that a joint application is always preferable. A sole application can provide certainty, reduce the risk of delays and offer reassurance where communication is poor or emotions are likely to change.
The most suitable option will depend upon the particular circumstances of the marriage and the relationship between the parties. Some couples benefit from a collaborative approach, while others find that maintaining independence from the outset creates a smoother and less stressful process.
Ultimately, both routes lead to the same legal outcome; the key is choosing the approach that best supports the realities of the separation.
If you would like advice on whether you should apply for divorce as a sole applicant or a joint applicant, or require guidance on financial settlements or child arrangements, please get in touch with our team today.
Find Out More:
Or call us: +44 (0)20 7430 8470