When it comes to divorce, judges in the family courts have a wide discretion to redistribute income and assets. Their main goal is to produce a result that’s fair to both sides. There’s no set formula – each case is different and will be judged on its own individual facts – but certain factors must be taken into account. While we cannot predict exactly what would be awarded we can certainly advise you, within certain limits, on the kind of financial settlement you can expect.

We always attempt to agree a settlement, rather than see a case go to a full, contested court hearing where a judge will have to impose a settlement on the parties. An agreed settlement is often quicker and will usually resolve a dispute more amicably. Also, the legal costs involved in a negotiated settlement will probably be less than if the matter proceeded to a contested court hearing. If a satisfactory settlement is not possible though, we would advise issuing an application that ultimately could go before a Judge to be decided.

Below we’ve set out the types of orders a court has the power to make in relation to financial settlements and the factors a judge must consider when making such orders. This page is meant as a guide only, so please feel free to ask us any questions.

1. Orders The Court Can Make

The orders available are as follows.

  • Maintenance pending suit: Maintenance for a spouse/civil partner to tide him/her over while the divorce is being finalised. It stops once the divorce/dissolution of a civil partnership is concluded.
  • Periodical Payments: Maintenance for an ex-spouse/civil partner which will start after divorce/dissolution. It can be open-ended or limited in time.
  • Secured Periodical Payments: Payments which are secured against property or assets to ensure payment. This is a rare type of order, but will be considered in exceptional circumstances.
  • Lump Sum Order: Payment of a lump sum of money from one spouse/civil partner to the other. There is no limit on the amount that can be awarded and it can be paid by instalments.
  • Property Orders: Various orders redistributing interests in property (usually the family home) can be made. These include a transfer of property from one spouse/civil partner to the other and a sale of the property which, if ordered, would include a direction on how the proceeds are to be divided. We deal more fully wit this aspect of financial settlements in Section 3 below.
  • Pension Orders: The court can order pension sharing or earmark part of the spouse/civil partner’s Pension Scheme for the benefit of the other spouse/civil partner.
  • Variation of Settlement Order: This gives the courts power to vary settlements or trusts that have been set up in favour of one spouse/civil partner. This is a rare type of order.

2. Financial Orders: Factors The Court Must Consider

When deciding what financial orders to make the court has a duty to consider all the circumstances of the case. Primary consideration must always be given to the welfare of any minor child of the family. The court will want to ensure that any minors have adequate accommodation. The specific factors  the court must consider are as follows:

  • The income, earning capacity, property and other financial resources of each party, including what each party is likely to have in the foreseeable future e.g. by way of inheritance.
  • The financial needs, obligations and responsibilities of each party.
  • The standard of living the family enjoyed before the marriage broke down.
  • The age of each party and the length of the marriage/civil partnership.
  • Any disability of either party.
  • Contributions made by each party to the welfare of the family, including contributions to be made in the foreseeable future.
  • The conduct of each party but only if that conduct is extreme.
  • The value to each party of any benefit that they will lose as a result of the divorce e.g. pension rights.

In medium to long marriages the starting point is equality, but it is important to note it is only a starting point. Different factors can push decisions on finances either way e.g. inheritances, exceptional contributions, gross bad behaviour etc. As we’ve said each case must be assessed on its own facts.

The Court will also specifically consider making each party financially independent of the other; to achieve what’s known as a “clean break”. While a clean break sounds attractive in theory, in practice it is often not as good as it sounds – so carefully consult us before agreeing to this type of settlement. .

3. Division Of The Family Home

The matrimonial/civil partnership property is often a couple’s most valuable asset. However, it usually also provides a home for the family and therefore must be given special consideration. A useful starting point is often to consider whether it is reasonable and financially possible for one of the parties to remain in the home (particularly the party with whom any children are to reside following divorce). If this is possible then the property can be transferred to that party, perhaps with an adjustment in the other party’s favour in terms of the amount of any lump sum that may become payable under the financial settlement. If enabling one party to remain in the family home is not financially possible, then the property could be transferred on the basis that it will be sold at a later date (usually when the remaining spouse/civil partner remarries or forms a further civil partnership or the children complete full-time education) when the vacating spouse/civil partner can receive a share of the proceeds. (This is known as a “Martin Order”).

Consideration would also have to be given to whether the remaining spouse/civil partner can discharge any mortgage on the family home and whether the mortgage company will agree to the mortgage being transferred into that party’s sole name. If a transfer from one party to the other is not appropriate, the court may decide that the property must remain in the joint names with a sale taking place at a later date. (This is known as a “Mesher Order”). Consideration may also be given to a sale of the property and division of the proceeds – especially where the size or value of the house was excessive to each party’s needs.

4. When Orders Can Be Made And Their Duration

An application can be made for a financial order any time after the filing of the divorce/dissolution or (judicial) separation application. The court can make an order for maintenance pending suit any time after the issue of the divorce application but can only make financial orders after the conditional order of divorce or dissolution. Property orders are not effective until the issuing of the final order of divorce or (judicial) separation order.

Any order for periodical payments should state how long such payments are to last or alternatively leave the duration open-ended. Either party can re-apply to the Court at any time before the order ends to vary the maintenance payments (upwards or downwards). This would normally be appropriate if there had been a change in circumstances. Because these types of order depend on joint lives, you might need to consider life insurance in case the payer dies during the term of the order.

Capital orders (i.e. lump sums and property orders) are normally phrased as being final. This means that neither party can re-apply to the Court at any stage in the future to vary the capital division.

It is important to note that remarriage or forming a subsequent civil partnership bars you from making a claim against your former spouse/civil partner if you have not initiated such a claim before remarriage. Further, your remarriage or subsequent civil partnership ends any entitlement to maintenance that was previously ordered to be paid by your former spouse/civil partner.

5. The Procedure

If agreement can be reached, then the solicitors on behalf of the parties can draw up an agreement known as a Consent Application. This is signed by the solicitors and lodged with the Court, where it is made into a formal Court order, known as a Consent Order. If agreement cannot be reached, then one or other party will have to make an application to the Court. We list below the steps taken before such an application is heard finally by a Judge.

a. Application

Your solicitor will prepare an application which will initiate the process. On submission to the Court, a hearing date will be fixed, known as the First Directions Appointment  or ‘First Appointment’ (FDA) some 12 to 16 weeks ahead. A strict timetable is then applied within which the parties must each prepare a financial statement known as Form E which the parties are required to fill out and exchange. The purpose of the form is to enable both sides to provide the Court with full details of their finances. If the form is complete and there are no further material questions left unanswered, then the chance of using the First Appointment as a Financial Dispute Resolution Appointment is considerably improved. In advance of the FDA the parties must each prepare a concise statement of issues, a chronology and a questionnaire setting out any further questions they want to ask or any further documentation required of the other party.

A notice must also be lodged with the court stating whether the party is able to proceed with the next stage (Financial Dispute Resolution Appointment or FDR) at the FDA thereby short circuiting matters. As we’ve said this is usually only possible when the disclosure given is relatively complete at an early stage and the issues are not too complex. For each hearing in the process the parties must also prepare an estimate of their legal costs to that point.

b. The First Directions Appointment (FDA)

The Court will give directions as to what questions are to be answered, whether any valuations are to be obtained etc. We usually recommend instructing a barrister for this appointment and probably we will have a preliminary meeting beforehand. A further timetable will be fixed and a Judge may adjourn the FDA or direct that the Financial Dispute Resolution Appointment (FDR) must take place. This will usually be fixed a few months ahead. In the interim both parties must comply with all the directions made at the FDA. We can leapfrog this FDA by agreement but experience tells us that – except in the simplest cases – that is not desirable.

c. The Financial Dispute Resolution Appointment (FDR)

This hearing is designed to define the issues and encourage the parties to reach agreement. Before the appointment each party must have submitted their proposals to the court. Note that:

  • No order can be made unless the matter is agreed.
  • If agreement is reached then the Court can make an order thus finalising matters.
  • If no agreement is reached then further directions can be given and the matter fixed for a Final Hearing.
  • The Judge who conducts the appointment is disbarred from adjudicating at the final hearing.
  • If the FDR does not settle the matter the court will list it for a final hearing usually some months ahead.

Where your solicitor attempts to negotiate a settlement on your behalf, the correspondence may be marked “Without Prejudice”. Any communication labelled this way will not be revealed to the court if the matter proceeds to a final hearing, enabling the party who made a without prejudice offer to suggest an entirely different order to the court. The reason to make a without prejudice offer is to enable the parties to negotiate freely without being held to any offers if the matter is not settled. If a without prejudice offer is accepted however it then becomes open and cannot remain private to the parties.

d. The Final Hearing

If it is necessary for there to be a final hearing, then both parties must attend court to give oral evidence and be cross-examined by the other party’s legal representative. This hearing usually takes place in front of a District Judge and no-one, other than the parties, their legal representatives and any necessary witnesses, such as valuers, may attend.

6. Legal Costs

It is common for each party to be responsible for their own costs if agreement is reached, although this is not always the case. For example, if one party has more income and/or capital than the other it may be appropriate that they agree to pay their spouse/civil partner’s legal costs.

If the matter proceeds to court, then the judge has the power at any stage of the proceedings, where he or she considers it appropriate, to make an order that one party pays the other party’s costs due to their conduct in relation to any failure to comply with the court rules, failure to disclose financial information, the reasonableness of their position etc.

7. Child Support

The Child Maintenance Service is in charge of the assessment and collection of child maintenance rather than the courts, save in a few exceptional circumstances. The Child Maintenance Service applies a formula in assessing the amount of child support payable. We can assist you in dealing with the Service and run a calculation for you, provided we have the necessary information.

Enquire Now

Or call us: +44 (0)20 7430 8470

Got a question about financial settlements? Ask us now...

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Everything you send in this form is secured and encrypted the moment you submit it. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Financial Settlement Scenarios

The scenarios below do not relate to any individual clients of ours but the facts and the outcomes relate to some similar experiences in our practice.

Scenario Analysis Example #1

The Scenario

Mrs G left the home last year due to her husband's alcoholism. The home is in his name and he refuses to co-operate. He works as a Sales Director and has a large pension accumulated from fifteen years with his employer.

Our Solution

Mrs G petitioned for divorce on the basis of her husband's unreasonable behaviour. At the same time we filed a financial application. When Mr G failed to make financial disclosure we obtained an Order requiring him to do so in 14 days or risk imprisonment for contempt of Court.

It was made clear that if he did not co-operate then the Court would make Orders giving Mrs G her share anyway and if necessary Mrs G would be given power to sell the house and to evict him. Mr G then settled the case.

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Scenario Analysis Example #2

The Scenario

In 1980 Mr G aged 25 was living with his partner.  When she became pregnant he made a Will making her the executor and leaving everything to her.  They separated 2 years later.  The child is now adult.  He re-partnered and had 1 child but the relationship again ended after 2 years.  He continued paying his ex partner’s rent rather than go through the Child Support Agency.  

He met his third partner in 1994 and they had 3 children.  He died in 2010.  He had never made another Will or revoked the one made in 1980, but he had quite substantial assets by the time of his death.  What rights did his ex- partners and 4 children have?

Our Solution

Briefly, Mr G left a huge mess.  His ex-partners challenged the Will in the Courts.  The dependent children had claims.  Did the adult son, who was independent and 28 years old, have a claim?  What rights did the mothers have where they were left supporting children under 18?

Ultimately a judge had to decide on the balance of fairness between the minor children bearing in mind the available resources.  His first partner and adult child did not receive anything.  The cost of sorting this out used almost half the estate.The moral is, make a Will!

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

Henry listened carefully to my circumstances, offered practical solutions, and explained the steps I need to take in a way that was easy to understand. His approach was genuinely helpful and empathetic, making a challenging time much easier to navigate.

Jul 2024   Tracy Henin

They were quick to respond and organise a consultation regarding my divorce proceedings. Henry was very knowledable and personable and the advice given really gave me the clarity I needed in an uncertain situation.

Jul 2024   Rebecca Lowe

My initial free consultation with Natasha Slabas was just over an hour and very informative. Natasha helped me understand the situation and the next steps involved. I would definitely proceed with Brookman Solicitors in the future if required. They were very quick to book the initial consultation and very professional.

Jul 2024   Rajan Marwaha

Had an initial free talk with them. I was impressed with their honesty and understanding of the situation.

Jun 2024   Dianne Wilkins

I had a 30-minute consultation with Samantha Jago where she clearly explained all my options and followed up with a detailed email of notes. I would highly recommend if you need help to clarify where you stand and getting options for how you move forward.

Jun 2024   Katherine Davey

I recently had a one hour pro bono consultation with Samantha Jago. I was really blown away by how much she was able to digest in such a short period of time and even more so by the report which I received shortly after.

Apr 2024   S DF

I had applied for a free consultation and I was contacted in a very short timeframe. Thank you so much for the insightful and thorough consultation, Kevin Danagher. You made me feel at ease and you provided clear expectations with the initial info I had provided... I have now a much better understanding on my query.

Feb 2024   Sonia Accardi

We had a very useful first consultation with Amber Matheson today. Amber took the time to understand our (somewhat complicated) set-up, and offered good, understandable advice on next steps. She followed up with a very thorough email clarifying what we had discussed. Highly recommended.

Feb 2024   Lucie

Lovely friendly experience. All questions were answered so that I understood completely.

Dec 2023   Ali Catlin

Very balanced, fair and pragmatic advice. Thoroughly recommend!!

Nov 2023   James Elliott

Henry graciously provided his time for a consultation. I found him to be highly knowledgeable, empathetic and he provided excellent advice which put my mind at ease. Would highly recommend Henry and his firm.

Oct 2023   Allan Ang

Henry Brookman went above and beyond during the free consultation, and even overran the allocated time. He provided invaluable professional advice in a courteous manner. I recommend his firm without reservation.

Sep 2023   Mario Ignatov

I only had my initial free review with Amelia yet I already feel much more strengthened in my legal and financial position. I am currently reflecting on the steps I want to take to negotiate my desired outcome of the financial settlement but, when I am ready to use the services of a lawyer, Amelia is definitely the top on my list.

Sep 2023   Nahid Toubia

I had a zoom consultation with Lauren Moir and she was incredible. Very patient, insightful and reassuring. She also advised me based on my previous conversations with another firm and also clarified various positions I am in. Highly recommend.

Aug 2023   Gary Hawes

I was very impressed with the friendly, helpful and professional service offered by Brookman Solicitors. The generous advice and knowledge offered during the initial free consultation has enabled us to have a much better understanding of our case and plan a way forward.

Jul 2023   Peter Jackson

About The Team

We are a specialist divorce and international divorce family law team, advising clients in the United Kingdom (specifically England and Wales) and throughout the world. We have a very people–orientated approach to working with clients. Henry Brookman has practised law for over 45 years, and our team has a wide range of skills and expertise. We are recommended by the Legal 500 and have been awarded the Law Society’s quality mark, Lexcel.

Partner

Henry Brookman

With over 45 years' experience, Henry Brookman is the senior member of the team. He is described by The Legal 500 as ‘shrewd, savvy, sagacious and highly experienced’.

Partner

Philip Morton

Recommended by The Legal 500, Philip is an expert in all areas of family law, including domestic and international financial disputes, fraud and commercial dispute resolution.

Partner

Natasha Slabas

Expert in all areas of family law, often involving cases that have an international element, including work in relation to financial settlements following divorce.

Partner

Mark Rennie

Mark is the Group Head of the Horsham Family Law team. He specialises in all areas of matrimonial law, including complex divorce and financial disputes, and is recommended by The Legal 500.

Partner

Nigel Winter

A highly experienced solicitor, Nigel has expertise in collaborative law, divorce, contested litigation, relationship agreements, and children matters. Nigel is recommended by The Legal 500.

Partner

Samantha Jago

Partner at our Guildford office and recommended by The Legal 500, Samantha has specialist expertise in divorce, children matters, complex international cases, and is a trained mediator.

Partner

Amanda Glass

Amanda is a highly experienced family law partner providing expert advice on all aspects of family law, divorce and separation with an emphasis on financial remedy cases.

Partner

Alicia Cenizo

Alicia is a Partner in the family team and advises on all elements of family law, particularly private children work, including matters with an international element such as relocation.

Partner

Joanna Potbury

Family law specialist based in Brighton advising on divorce, cohabitation agreements, children, post-nuptial agreements, and domestic violence. Joanna is recommended by The Legal 500.

Partner

Kevin Danagher

Kevin specialises exclusively in family law, advising on all aspects of relationship breakdown, divorce, same sex marriage, marital agreements, and international family cases.

Partner

Gemma Garrett

Based in Horsham, Gemma is a specialist advising on all areas of family law including divorce and separation (often involving jurisdiction issues), complex financial matters, and children matters.

Senior Associate

Kirsty Kelleher

Kirsty is a specialist family law solicitor recommended by The Legal 500. An expert in divorce, financial matters, child-related disputes and contentious probate cases.

Senior Associate

Ella Welsby

Known for her sensitivity and discretion combined with significant expertise, Ella advises on all family issues including high-value and multi-jurisdiction divorce and complex financial and children matters.

Senior Solicitor

Susan Hayes

Susan qualified as a solicitor in 1992 and is based at our Brighton office. She is a longstanding member of the Law Society Specialist Children Panel and Family Law Panel. Susan is also a trained Collaborative Lawyer.

Associate Solicitor

Lauren Moir

Lauren is a highly regarded specialist family law solicitor, based at our Guildford office. She advises on divorce, family finances, children matters, domestic abuse, cohabitee issues, and relationship agreements.

Associate Solicitor

Rachael Au

Rachael is a highly capable member of the family team in Brighton. She specialises in family law, advising on divorce, civil partnerships, financial matters, and children issues.

Associate Solicitor

Amber Matheson

Based at the Guildford office, Amber has experience dealing with family matters including divorce, finances, separation after cohabitation, arrangements for children and leave to remove cases.

Solicitor

Amelia Groom

Amelia has experience across a full range of family matters, including divorce, complex disputes regarding finances that range from trusts through to cryptocurrencies, and arrangements for children.

Executive FCILEx

Natalie Higham

Natalie is a Family Legal Executive who advises individuals on divorce, separation, financial remedies available to them on the breakdown of their relationship,…

Accounts Manager

Evdokia Dikova

Eva is an AAT qualified accounts manager and holds full AAT membership (MAAT). She gained her degree in financial accounting from the University of Economics in Bulgaria.

Secretary

Victoria Delatouche

Victoria is a highly experienced Legal Secretary and a long-standing member of the team. She provides secretarial support for the office.

Secretary

Michelle Louison

Michelle provides secretarial support to Henry Brookman. A very experienced family law secretary, Michelle has worked in law for over 12 years.

Front of House Manager

Patricia James

Patricia is an experienced secretary and office administrator, handling the calls that come into the office, greeting clients, and managing office presentation.

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 8470