Business As Usual: Please note that Brookman’s services to clients remain uninterrupted during the pandemic. Read more

Japan Divorce & Family Law

International Divorce & Family Law: Japan

There are three types of divorce in Japan: divorce by agreement, divorce by litigation and divorce by conciliation (mediation) handled by the court. Divorce by agreement is possible when the spouses agree to divorce and apply to the registry. In such cases, the property is divided by agreement, but if no agreement is reached, the parties may apply for conciliation at the family court. Divorce can be achieved by litigation, but this is preceded by mandatory conciliation. When the parties fail to agree on divorce via conciliation, litigation (adjudication) procedure may be initiated.

Dividing the property

The Civil Code which contains Family Law provides that a spouse may claim the allocation of the property. If the parties fail to agree, the family court may adjudicate.

The idea of the division of the property is to divide the property possessed by the spouses during the marriage. This means that the property which spouses had from before the marriage is not included.

The division of the property is highly discretionary. If the court is to make the decision, “the amount of property acquired through co-operation of the spouses, and all other circumstances” are to be taken into account.

The maintenance of the divorced spouse is an important factor.

Jurisdictional problems

There are two Supreme Court judgments on the matter of jurisdiction in cross-border divorce. The first case involved a divorce between two non-Japanese nationals. The only nexus was that the plaintiff was a resident in Japan. The Court acknowledged jurisdiction. Thus, it was understood that, in general, if the defendant resides in Japan, Japanese courts have jurisdiction, but this was not unanimously supported.

A more recent case involved a Japanese husband and a German wife. The wife obtained judgment in Germany in the absence of the husband. The husband was a resident of Japan. The husband initiated litigation in Japan simultaneously The first instance court denied jurisdiction of Japan, but the Supreme Court ruled that if a spouse is a Japanese national and resides in Japan, Japanese courts have jurisdiction in such cases (24 June 1996). In this case, the Court ruled that if the defendant has an address in Japan, Japanese courts have jurisdiction, but in other cases, jurisdiction should be determined on the basis of Reason (jōri). Thus, there is no established rule on the determination of jurisdiction.

The cost and time

Between Japanese parties, it takes at the most, six months. However, with jurisdictional issues involved, it may take longer.

The court cost is negligible. However, documents need to be translated into Japanese and a lawyer has to be retained.

(With thanks and acknowledgement to Professor Hiroshi Oda).

How we help you

We are specialist international divorce lawyers and family solicitors and we have advised numerous clients who are either UK-based but originate from Japan, or are living outside of the UK but have a connection with England or Wales.

Enquire Now

Got a question about Japan? ask us now...

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry.
Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors.
Discretion is guaranteed.


  • 1. Personal Information:

  • You do not need to provide a telephone number, however, it is helpful for us should our email response not be successfully delivered to you
  • 2. More Information

    Is there anything else you would like to tell us at this stage?
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

What our clients are saying:

‘CI’, Taiwan

“I would like to say a very big thank you to Talitha, if you could please pass the message on. I have found the service of the company to be of the highest quality and am so grateful that she was able to assist me and did so in the most efficient and professional way. Please convey my deepest gratitude and thanks for her time and effort.”


Google Reviews

Brookman Solicitors

61 Reviews

Jamie Warnes 16/03/2020

Excellent service. I had a consultation directly with Mr Brookman and his advice and guidance was very clear and helpful. Would highly recommend.

Deana Kendall 12/02/2020

I had been referred by a friend who has a close connection with the firm. I met with Mr Henry Brookman who offered me a free initial consultation to discuss my matter. Mr Brookman is very thorough and has great attention to detail and care. I genuinely feel that he has a great understanding of my circumstances and situation. Moving forward, I have received continuous updates (when relevant) regarding developments to my situation and all correspondences are clear. I feel confident with Mr Brookman's guidance and excellent team! Though my matter is still on-going for the time being, I cannot highly recommend enough! In any event, I will always be eternally grateful to Mr Brookman and his team.

Emma Hearse 03/02/2020

I had an initial consultation with Mr. Brookman, his advice was extremely thorough and relevant. I would recommend Brookman Solicitors.

Caroline Keane 17/01/2020

It was great to have a free initial consultation with Henry Brookman. He answered my questions, and I finished the conversation knowing what I needed to do next in order to resolve matters.

Niamh Tracey Smith 10/12/2019

Highly recommended. Speak to Senior Partner Henry Brookman directly to put your mind at ease and for expert guidance. Invaluable.