View this page in Polish

It is not uncommon for individuals who have a connection with Poland to choose to undertake their divorce, property or children proceedings in the UK. Their family and living circumstances will dictate whether this is an option. It is certainly worth seeking early advice from a lawyer regarding your options as the choice of country in which proceedings take place may well be important, particularly in terms of the financial outcomes.

The Polish rules on division of property in a divorce are set out below. The English rules on financial arrangements in a divorce are set out in our financial settlements page.

The Polish Courts

The Polish courts have jurisdiction in relation to divorce, property and children proceedings if a defendant has a domicile or habitual residence in Poland. The concept of domicile involves permanent location of the party within Poland. Temporary absence will not affect domicile. A habitual residence may be a place where a person lives for any period of time. Polish courts have jurisdiction if;

  • both spouses had their last domicile or their last habitual residence in Poland or if one of them still has domicile or habitual residence in Poland;
  • the plaintiff spouse had for at least one year prior to commencing proceedings, domicile or habitual residence in Poland;
  • the plaintiff spouse is a Polish citizen and had for at least six months prior to commencing proceedings, domicile or habitual residence in Poland; or
  • both spouses are Polish citizens.

Just because a marriage took place in Poland, this does not mean that the Polish Courts necessarily have jurisdiction, and it does not mean that divorce proceedings have to be taken out in Poland. Because the UK and Poland are both parties to the Brussels II Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003, this means that whichever country proceedings are filed in first takes precedence, provided its jurisdictional requirements are met. This again underlines the importance of contacting a lawyer as early as possible.


On divorce, at the demand of one of the spouses, a Polish court will divide community property as long as the division does not cause undue delay to divorce proceedings.

Community property includes everything that has been acquired by the married couple or either spouse during the marriage, unless otherwise provided by statute. In particular, community property includes remuneration received from employment or other gainful activity of either spouse as well as the income from the community property and/or the separate property of either spouse.

Separate property consists of property acquired by either spouse prior to the establishment of the community property system. For all practical purposes, this means that all pre-marital property remains separate.

Household appliances used by both spouses also form part of the community property if they were acquired by inheritance, bequest or donation, unless the testator or donor stipulated otherwise.

The court has a substantial range of possibilities with respect to structuring a division of community property. The court can award certain assets to one spouse and certain assets to the other, or order that it be sold and the money divided. Each spouse should receive assets of the same value. To equalise the division of assets, the value of individual shares can be compensated by additional cash payments. These payments can be spread out in instalments for a maximum period of ten years. However, each spouse could demand that the court establish different shares when dividing community property, taking into account each spouse’s contribution to the property. When assessing the degree of each spouse’s contribution to the property, the court will consider raising children and homemaking activities. The court will also consider the fault of the spouse in the breakdown of marriage.

Spousal Maintenance

There is a reciprocal obligation of spouses to support each other. Both spouses are obliged according to their strength, earning capacity and resources to contribute towards meeting the needs of the family founded by their marriage. On divorce this obligation ceases. The divorced spouse who has not been found exclusively guilty of the breakdown of marriage and who finds him/herself in poverty can demand the other spouse to provide maintenance within their earning capacity and resources, appropriate for the justified needs of the entitled spouse. Poverty should be understood as the state in which one cannot meet one’s own basic needs.

The divorced spouse found exclusively guilty of the breakdown of the marriage is not entitled to spousal maintenance. Regardless of whether the innocent spouse is in poverty or not, if their standard of living reduces slightly then the spouse found guilty is obliged to pay spousal maintenance. To decide whether the standard of living of the innocent spouse has deteriorated, the court will compare the financial situation after the divorce with the situation they would have been in prior to the divorce. The obligation to pay spousal maintenance expires only on death or remarriage of the innocent spouse.

If the ex-spouse has not been found guilty of the breakdown of marriage then his/her obligation to pay spousal maintenance expires after five years from the date of the divorce verdict, unless extended by the court at the request of the entitled spouse.


Poland is a party to the Hague Convention on the International Abduction of Children. It also is bound by the Brussels I and Brussels II Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003. The UK is a party to the same treaties. This means that if a child is taken from Poland to the UK without both parents agreeing or permission of a Polish Court the Courts in the UK will treat that as a child abduction. Likewise if a child who is habitually resident in the UK is removed to Poland without the agreement of both parents or permission of the Court, the Polish Courts will treat that as a child abduction and return the child to England. There are only very limited defences to applications for return. On divorce, the court must determine custody over the minor children.

The court takes into account the agreement of the spouses on exercising parental responsibility and visitations if it is in the best interest of the child. Siblings should not be separated unless in the children’s best interest. The court can designate one parent as the custodial parent, limiting the parental responsibility of the second parent to specific rights and duties in relation to the child, for example, participation in decision-making concerning the child’s education, health and religious upbringing.

In determining custody in divorce proceedings, the gender of the parent still seems to be one of the most important factors. The courts favour mothers of young children. The preference for the mother as custodian especially of younger children is traditionally explained by the alleged existence of the greater emotional commitment of women to children. However, this may in time produce a conflict with the EU regulation requirement.

Regardless of parental responsibility, the parent and child have the right and duty to maintain contact with each other. If the parents are not able to reach an agreement to maintain contact, the court will decide on visitation rights. Contact with the child can include, visiting the child, taking the child outside his place of residence, direct and distant communication and maintaining correspondence. In extreme situations where the visit could seriously endanger the child, the court can deny the right of visitation.

Conflict of Law

When one of the parties applies to stay proceedings in favour of a foreign jurisdiction, the Polish court will consider both the Polish Code of Civil Procedure and any relevant European Regulations, such as Brussels II, or international agreements signed by Poland that relate to the relevant issues. If one of the parties in divorce proceedings applies for a change of jurisdiction in favour of one of the other member states of the European Union, the Polish courts will take into account matters concerning jurisdiction, the enforcement of judgements in matrimonial matters and the issue of parental responsibility.

Rather the same kind of rules apply in the UK. Possibly the country where proceedings were first filed will take precedence pursuant to the Brussels II Regulation (described above) or other matters may be taken into account by the Courts in the UK.

What this means in practice is that if you have competing Court proceedings in both countries, there has to be a careful look at all the surrounding issues such as whether there was jurisdiction for those proceedings, which was first, what the proceedings relate to, and whether the rules that would allow you to stay one or other country’s proceedings will apply.

Enquire Now

Or call us: +44 (0)20 7430 8470

Got a question about Poland? Ask us now...

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Divorce Videos

Henry Brookman has created several discussion videos in order to further explain some areas of divorce.

International Divorce

Watch Henry Brookman summarise divorce and common divorce myths.

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Henry Brookman Discusses: Divorce
Henry Brookman Discusses: Common Divorce Myths

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

Talitha offers sound advice, asks the right questions and advises you with what you need to know not just what you want to hear. I have no hesitation in recommending her services.

Sep 2021   Anu Vidyarthi

Henry took the time to go through all the details of my separation thoroughly. He was very clear on what my options were and what I needed to do to have a seamless agreement with my ex. Thank you for all your help!

Aug 2021   Sandeep Cina

Talitha provided a free consultation and could not have been more helpful. Her guidance was pragmatic and she managed my expectations both on costs and the process. Talitha offered practical advice to find a solution that could avoid going to court.

Aug 2021   Richard Doyle

I had an initial chat with Kevin, the senior associate. Extra ordinary talent to convince parties, very intelligent and I was wonderstuck at his brilliant knowledge of family law.

Aug 2021   Mrs. M. Merchant

I have nothing but positive feedback about this firm... Lorraine Imms from Brookman was absolutely brilliant... Her knowledge is exceptional and she has kept me informed through every step... I'd give ten stars if I could!

Jun 2021   Martin Byrne

Myself and my mother had a free video consultation with Mr. Brookman regarding my mother's divorce and were both impressed with his knowledge on divorce matters, professionalism and understanding. Henry then followed up with us with a clear plan of what he suggests we do...

Mar 2021   Bruna Cordeiro Pezzano

I had a consultation with Mr. Brookman and was impressed with his honesty, knowledge and understanding of my situation. He seemed to take a genuine interest in my case, which immediately put me at ease.

Mar 2021   Chichi

Very swift response and concise information. I had a very engaging free consultation with Mr Brookman initially which was informative and professional.

Feb 2021   Garry Ralph

I would like to say my experience with Mr Brookman was an extremely positive experience. His knowledge, advice and compassion put me very much at ease and made a very difficult situation much more bearable.

Feb 2021   Jenny Brock

Very helpful, and honest about my situation even though it wasn’t business for them at this time. Would recommend.

Jan 2021   Natalie Roche

About The Team

We are a specialist divorce and international divorce family law team, advising clients in the United Kingdom (specifically England and Wales) and throughout the world. We have a very people–orientated approach to working with clients. Henry Brookman has practised law for over 45 years, and our team has a wide range of skills and expertise. We are recommended by the Legal 500 and have been awarded the Law Society’s quality mark, Lexcel.


Henry Brookman

With over 45 years' experience, Henry Brookman is the senior member of the team. He is described by The Legal 500 as ‘shrewd, savvy, sagacious and highly experienced’.


Talitha Brookman

Talitha is a Partner in the firm and a very experienced practitioner. She has been exclusively practising family law for over 15 years and is a recognised expert in her field.


Philip Morton

Recommended by The Legal 500, Philip is an expert in all areas of family law, including domestic and international financial disputes, fraud and commercial dispute resolution.


Natasha Slabas

Expert in all areas of family law, often involving cases that have an international element, including work in relation to financial settlements following divorce.


Aziz Malik

Aziz is a Partner at the firm and is highly regarded for his expertise on financial matters in divorce and has been recommended by the Legal 500.

Senior Associate

Kirsty Kelleher

Kirsty is a specialist family law solicitor recommended by The Legal 500. An expert in divorce, financial matters, child-related disputes and contentious probate cases.

Senior Associate

Kevin Danagher

Kevin specialises exclusively in family law, advising on all aspects of relationship breakdown, divorce, same sex marriage, marital agreements, and international family cases.

Associate Solicitor

Jennifer Douglas

Jennifer is a talented solicitor, experienced in all elements of family law, including high net worth financial proceedings, Children Act proceedings and financial claims.

Associate Solicitor

Gavin Yeung

Gavin has excellent experience in family law including divorce and financial proceedings and international child abduction proceedings involving Hague Convention countries.

Senior Associate

Pippa Marshall

Pippa’s experience covers all areas of family law including divorce, financial remedies, same sex relationships, pre- and post-nuptial agreements and cohabitee property disputes.

Chartered Legal Executive

Lorraine Imms

With over 20 years' family law experience, Lorraine can advise on divorce, matrimonial finances, cohabitee disputes, nuptial agreements and private children matters.

Office Manager

Lorna Martin

Lorna is our Office Manager who oversees the operations of the firm including providing accounts support as well as secretarial support to the team.

Accounts Manager

Evdokia Dikova

Eva is an AAT qualified accounts manager and holds full AAT membership (MAAT). She gained her degree in financial accounting from the University of Economics in Bulgaria.


Victoria Delatouche

Victoria is a highly experienced Legal Secretary and a long-standing member of the team. She provides secretarial support for the office.


Michelle Louison

Michelle provides secretarial support to Henry Brookman. A very experienced family law secretary, Michelle has worked in law for over 12 years.

Front of House Manager

Patricia Antonio

Patricia is an experienced secretary and office administrator, handling the calls that come into the office, greeting clients, and managing office presentation.

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 8470