Judges have a wide discretion to decide how to divide assets on divorce. This can inject a degree of unpredictability into disputed financial settlement cases. Where there are high value assets at stake the repercussions can be significant. This is one reason why we try to help our clients agree financial settlements. But if agreement proves impossible and you have to go to court it’s essential to understand the principles the courts apply when deciding how to distribute assets on divorce.

What Is The Sharing Principle?

One of the key principles is the ‘sharing principle’. This means that matrimonial assets – those built up over the course of a marriage – will be divided or shared equally on divorce provided there is no good reason to depart from the principle.

The idea of sharing assets equally is relatively straightforward to apply when we are considering property like land, buildings, furniture or stocks and shares. Things are less clear when one spouse develops an earning capacity or income stream during the marriage, for example from a business that the other spouse has helped secure. Should that future income stream also be shared?

It seems not. Just last year the courts ruled in Waggott v Waggott that earning capacity or an income stream was not capable of being a matrimonial asset to which the sharing principle applies. According to the judge in the case the wife would only be entitled to a share in the husband’s future earnings if it were necessary to meet her reasonable needs.

Can Future Income Be Shared After Divorce? The O’Dwyer Case

The Waggott approach has just been reiterated by the High Court in the case of O’Dwyer v O’Dwyer.

Mr. and Mrs. O’Dwyer split up in 2016 and the marital assets were valued at approximately £6 million. This included an interest in an extremely successful McDonalds franchise business with an agreed value of £2.4 million. The husband ran and managed the franchise and received an income of around £1million a year from it.

Because this was a lengthy marriage (28 years) and because both parties had contributed equally to produce the existing assets the Central Family Court decided that this was a typical ‘sharing’ case where the marital assets should be divided equally. However the judge in the lower court also took the view that the husband’s projected £1million a year from the McDonalds business was a matrimonial asset capable of benefitting the wife into the future. With this in mind he ordered that the husband should pay the wife £150,000 in maintenance.

Relying on the decision in Waggott that we mentioned above, the husband appealed against the maintenance order. In the High Court the judge rejected the wife’s attempts to differentiate her claim from Waggott and ruled that the lower court judge had been wrong to treat the future McDonalds income as a joint asset.

The High Court judge proceeded to calculate that the wife’s annual financial needs were £120,000 and by using income from her capital she could generate £52,000. The result was that the wife’s maintenance order was more than halved – from £150,000 to £68,000.

Comment

Following the decision in Waggott a lot of legal insiders suggested it heralded the end if the so-called meal ticket for life for spouses in contested financial settlement cases.  After all, the rationale for the decision in Waggott was made clear by the judge in the following terms:

any extension of the sharing principle to post-separation earnings would fundamentally undermine the court’s ability to effect a clean break”

The belief was that the case indicated a trend of less generous settlements for financially weaker spouses. And the decision in O’Dwyer seems to confirm that joint lives maintenance orders will be less common in future.

While many welcome these decisions because they facilitate clean break divorce in complex cases, critics argue that they are unfair to the financially weaker spouse. In the O’Dwyer case, for example, the wife is expected to use her capital immediately to produce an income that will shore up her level of maintenance. The husband on the other hand can leave his capital untouched while relying on the income from a business that was arguably built up by both spouses during the course of the marriage.

For advice on financial settlements and how assets may be divided call Brookman Solicitors in London on + 44 (0) 20 7430 8470 or contact us online.

Got a question? Ask us now…

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

Today I had my free initial consultation with partner Henry Brookman over the phone. He had a clear understanding of my situation based on the info I provided in advance and provided me with sound advice and guidance to move forward. Many thanks.

Aug 2022   H. J.

Really appreciated Brookman's advice and support. Most lawyers charge extortionate fees just for an initial conversation but not Henry. Thanks for all your advice and time.

Jul 2022   Chloé

I had a consultation with the partner Henry Brookman. I can absolutely recommend him, he seemed knowledgeable, up to date and patient. I have found him to be straightforward in the answers he gives and down to earth. 100% recommended.

Jun 2022   Michael P

I have no hesitation whatsoever in recommending Henry Brookman. His advice came in promptly when solicited, and was excellent. He is a thoughtful and very professional lawyer. He understood perfectly well the issue I presented him with, and gave me excellent advice in a family law related matter.

May 2022   Philip Hands

From my first contact with the firm I was treated courteously and promptly. I was offered a pro bono meeting shortly after making contact. Mr Brookman is clearly a very experienced professional and in our meeting he gave me some well considered and objective advice about my rather complicated situation which spans more than one jurisdiction.

May 2022   Julian Peachey

I had an initial consultation with Henry Brookman regarding prenuptial agreements and found him to be very helpful and knowledgeable.

Mar 2022   Simon Brooks

I had a free telephone consultation yesterday with Gavin Yeung. He could not have been more helpful and reassuring as he calmly and patiently worked through my situation to provide me with clarity and piece of mind at a time it was really needed and emotions are running high.

Mar 2022   'K M'

I spoke with Aziz at Brookman Solicitors on the phone for an initial consultation and he is one of the friendliest lawyers I have met. He is clearly very experienced as he patiently explained me all the concepts and processes which are quite daunting for someone in my situation, and then focused on the actual questions I wanted to ask... I would highly recommend Aziz and Brookman Solicitors.

Feb 2022   'R'

I am grateful for Henry Brookman and his team for support they provided to me during very frustrating time of divorce. They respond promptly to any request. I felt more confident after I started the process with them. Henry listened carefully to me and took quick actions on my case. I highly recommend this team of real professionals even for non-UK citizens.

Feb 2022   Sezim Beksultanova

I had online consultation with the partner Henry Brookman today. I was very happy with the service. I found him to be very insightful, knowledgeable and provided sound advice, as well as being kind and patient. It was a very comfortable discussion and he sent an email detailing our discussion very quickly discussing in our meeting in depth. I am amazed by the service we got just from a free consultation. I would highly recommend these solicitors!

Jan 2022   Shirley Christopher

We spoke at length and at no point felt like he was rushing us and we felt very comfortable. After our discussion we were also quickly sent an email detailing everything we were discussing in our meeting in depth. I am amazed by the service we got just from a free consultation. I would highly recommend these solicitors!

Dec 2021   Tina

I was fortunate to spend an hour running through a few questions with Natasha Slabas. She was quick to grasp the points raised and proposed a sensible way forward. Would recommend

Dec 2021   Nick Powell

I cannot praise the professionalism and courtesy too highly. The advice given in a very complex divorce matter, was clear, concise, enlightening and inspiring.

Nov 2021   Mary Barn

I contacted Henry Brookman because of the complex international aspect of my divorce and I’m very glad I did... Henry took his time explaining all the pro’s and contra’s... I now have a much clearer view over the situation and feel more confident going forward. I’m very grateful for the excellent advice I’ve received and not feeling rushed during the meeting.

Nov 2021   'A B'

Talitha offers sound advice, asks the right questions and advises you with what you need to know not just what you want to hear. I have no hesitation in recommending her services.

Sep 2021   Anu Vidyarthi

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 8470