Section 25 of the Matrimonial Causes Act lists the factors the courts need to consider when making orders in financial remedy cases. It’s well-established that if a spouse is – or is entitled to – receive income or capital from a trust then this is a financial resource that the court can use to find a fair financial settlement between the parties.

You can find a bit more detail on the nature of trusts here. Below we look at some of the ways courts approach trust assets during divorce.

When Will The Court Use Trust Assets As Part Of A Financial Order?

If the courts decide that the trust is a ‘nuptial trust’ or ‘settlement’ (it’s designed to benefit a spouse or children) then the courts have wide powers to vary the trust and apply it in a way that enables a fair overall financial settlement. Note that a nuptial trust can be in existence before marriage.

Even where a trust is non-nuptial – for example it was set up by the family of one spouse independently of the marriage – the assets of the trust may nevertheless be relevant in reaching a financial settlement. This might occur where it can be established that the beneficiary spouse has, over the course of the marriage, received income or capital from the trust. In such a scenario that income or capital can be viewed as a financial resource of that spouse that should be taken into account in the financial settlement.

The courts of England and Wales can make orders in respect of offshore trusts although their powers to do so vary depending on the jurisdiction in which the trust is located.

Limitation Of Court Powers In Relation To Trust Assets

In exercising powers in relation to trusts the courts are to some extent hampered by the fact that often there will be a whole class of beneficiaries of the trust – apart from those involved in the divorce. The position of the spouses getting divorced will not necessarily be a priority for the trustees when it comes to exercising their powers. In general, the family courts don’t have the power to undermine the trustees or to interfere with the rights of other trust beneficiaries.

What judges can do however is provide ‘judicious encouragement’ to trustees – by suggesting that the trustees provide the spouse who is a beneficiary under the trust with the means to comply with the financial order the court has made. The practice of judges framing financial orders like this (effectively asking trustees to act in a certain way) is not without controversy. Many trust lawyers believe it undermines the fundamentals of trust law and the discretionary powers of trustees.

Nevertheless, the use of judicious encouragement is common in practice, and is often the only way to address the reality of a complex legal situation. This would tend to suggest that family court judges don’t think the approach conflicts with trust law principles.

A Pragmatic Approach To Trusts

The 2023 case of ES v SS shows the flexibility available to the courts when dealing with trust assets. It is also a reminder of the danger of incurring excessive costs in dealing with trust assets.

This was a hotly contested divorce case where most financial aspects had been settled with a matrimonial pot of around £40 million already divided.

The outstanding question was what to do with a trust find valued at circa £2million. Both parties agreed that the assets of the trust were entirely matrimonial and that they each had an equal entitlement to them. However, there were problems in valuing the net assets. In particular, there was a significant difficulty in assessing the tax liabilities attached to the trust. The calculations involved applying tax law in several different jurisdictions, and the tax experts appointed during proceedings disagreed.

After weighing up various options, including the creation of a bare trust that would give the children automatic entitlement to the finds when they reached 18, the court made an order winding up the trust and splitting the funds between the spouses. This decision was reached against a backdrop of almost £300,000 having spent in legal fees arguing about what to do with the trust.

Form E and Trusts

As with all assets, any benefit you receive under a trust should be disclosed in the normal way on Form E. Often the details you provide in relation to trusts will be a starting point only. Your spouse is likely to request further details and the production of the trust instruments. There may also be some involvement with the trustees.

Got a question? Ask us now…

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Terms of Service and our Privacy Notices apply.

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

I had a very thorough consultation with Mr. Henry Brookman, he is very experienced in family law & was very professional.

Sep 2026   Jan Ball

I had a consultation with Henry Brookman regarding a family law matter and had an excellent experience... His advice was clear, practical and refreshingly honest.

Aug 2026   Zain Mirz

In an initial consultation I met Lauren Blythe, who I would highly recommend. Lauren is very knowledgeable and provided me with clear information.

Aug 2026   "S"

Had an initial consultation with Lauren who is very polite, very knowledgeable and provided me with valuable information and next steps.

Jul 2026   Paul Murphy

Very helpful initial consultation. the solicitor was professional, listened carefully, and explained my options clearly without any pressure. I left with a much better understanding of the process and my next steps. Thank you.

Jul 2026   Khadija Mouaddab

I had a consultation with Lauren Blythe and was incredibly impressed by her professionalism and clarity. She provided exceptionally clear, realistic, and highly strategic advice, immediately identifying the key pillars needed to navigate a complex family matter efficiently.

Jun 2026   Ed Whelan

I had a free consultation with Philip Morton... He took the time to listen to my situation and gave his opinion on how to approach the situation, what would be involved, risks and costs. It was a very helpful conversation that felt genuine and without pressure.

May 2026   Matthias Lederhofer

I had a consultation with Henry Brookman and it was excellent. He answered all of my questions thoroughly, paid close attention to every detail, and was very professional and helpful throughout.

May 2026   Mehrdad Ghanavati far

Alicia provided me with excellent counsel on short notice. Her approach was grounded, professional and took into consideration all of the provided facts accurately

May 2026   Dasha Borysov

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 8470