The phenomenon of divorce tourism is not ideal. It puts unwanted pressure on the courts here to adjudicate on lengthy jurisdiction battles in cases where there is often only a slight connection to the UK. But establishing that the courts in England and Wales have the power to decide financial matters can make a huge difference to a final settlement. So in many high net worth divorces the battle over jurisdiction is one that is worthwhile for one of the parties. And these cases can be bitterly fought.

At Brookman Solicitors in London we regularly advise clients on the best place to divorce in their circumstances. For many years, the courts in England and Wales have been favoured by financially weaker spouses for a number of reasons, including:

  • Judges here have greater flexibility and discretion than in other countries
  • Equal weight is given to a spouse who goes out to work and one who stays at home
  • Maintenance awards are often more substantial for a spouse who does not work

ESTABLISHING RESIDENCE IN ENGLAND AND WALES

Jurisdiction in divorce cases centres on residence. A recent High Court decision – Pierburg v Pierburg – has left many legal commentators wondering whether the test for establishing residence and habitual residence has become more onerous. This could make it more difficult for some individuals to have their divorce heard in London and reduce the incentive to embark on divorce tourism or forum shopping in the first place.

If couples meet the jurisdictional requirements under EU law they are essentially free to start divorce proceedings here.

PIERBURG v PIERBURG

The Pierburgs are seeking a divorce following thirty years of marriage. They are both German nationals. Before their marriage they signed an agreement whereby in the event of divorce Mrs Pierburg agreed not to make any claims on her husband’s assets or make any claim for maintenance.

Mrs Pierburg wanted to divorce in England. For her the stakes could not have been higher: If the English courts refused jurisdiction and her divorce was heard in Germany, the pre nuptial agreement mentioned above may well be upheld –leaving her with nothing. Contrast that with a potential ruling on financial relief by an English court that has the power to award her a substantial portion of family assets irrespective of the prenup.

THE PIERBURGS AND RESIDENCE

Since the 2000s the couple had lived in Switzerland. However they also had a house in London. Following the breakdown of the marriage in mid 2017 Mrs Pierburg moved into the London property. When in January 2018 she issued divorce proceedings in London she did so arguing that she had been resident in England for 6 months and was domiciled here. If she could prove this the English courts would assume jurisdiction and hear her application for divorce.

Shortly after the English petition was lodged Mr Pierburg issued his own petition in Germany seeking the divorce there. He claimed his wife was “German to the core” and had never indicated a wish to live in London. Those proceedings were put on hold until the English courts decided the issue of jurisdiction.

DECISION

Mr Justice Moor ultimately agreed with Mr Pierburg. He found that while Mrs Pierburg had resided in London since 2017 there were no other links to the UK before this. She had not been habitually resident in London. He agreed she visited London regularly but said “she did not reside here as she basically confirmed in her oral evidence when she said she ‘visited’ regularly.”

Despite her evidence she had significant emotional and physical ties to Germany and in the judge’s opinion was not domiciled in England when she initiated divorce proceedings.

It will now be up to the German court to decide the terms of the Pierburg divorce.

ANALYSIS OF THE RESIDENCE REQUIREMENT

Before Pierburg there was some doubt among family lawyers as to whether it was necessary to be habitually resident for the entire time stipulated in the regulations before presenting a divorce petition (6 or 12 months) or whether one needs only to be habitually resident at the time of presenting a petition.

Judge Moor is clear that habitual residence is required for the entre time set out in the rules, not just at the date of petition. He also indicated that while it’s possible to be resident in a number of places at the same time (for example working in London during the week and returning to a family home at weekends in another country) it is only ever possible to be habitually resident in one place.

Got a question? Ask us now…

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

Today I had my free initial consultation with partner Henry Brookman over the phone. He had a clear understanding of my situation based on the info I provided in advance and provided me with sound advice and guidance to move forward. Many thanks.

Aug 2022   H. J.

Really appreciated Brookman's advice and support. Most lawyers charge extortionate fees just for an initial conversation but not Henry. Thanks for all your advice and time.

Jul 2022   Chloé

I had a consultation with the partner Henry Brookman. I can absolutely recommend him, he seemed knowledgeable, up to date and patient. I have found him to be straightforward in the answers he gives and down to earth. 100% recommended.

Jun 2022   Michael P

I have no hesitation whatsoever in recommending Henry Brookman. His advice came in promptly when solicited, and was excellent. He is a thoughtful and very professional lawyer. He understood perfectly well the issue I presented him with, and gave me excellent advice in a family law related matter.

May 2022   Philip Hands

From my first contact with the firm I was treated courteously and promptly. I was offered a pro bono meeting shortly after making contact. Mr Brookman is clearly a very experienced professional and in our meeting he gave me some well considered and objective advice about my rather complicated situation which spans more than one jurisdiction.

May 2022   Julian Peachey

I had an initial consultation with Henry Brookman regarding prenuptial agreements and found him to be very helpful and knowledgeable.

Mar 2022   Simon Brooks

I had a free telephone consultation yesterday with Gavin Yeung. He could not have been more helpful and reassuring as he calmly and patiently worked through my situation to provide me with clarity and piece of mind at a time it was really needed and emotions are running high.

Mar 2022   'K M'

I spoke with Aziz at Brookman Solicitors on the phone for an initial consultation and he is one of the friendliest lawyers I have met. He is clearly very experienced as he patiently explained me all the concepts and processes which are quite daunting for someone in my situation, and then focused on the actual questions I wanted to ask... I would highly recommend Aziz and Brookman Solicitors.

Feb 2022   'R'

I am grateful for Henry Brookman and his team for support they provided to me during very frustrating time of divorce. They respond promptly to any request. I felt more confident after I started the process with them. Henry listened carefully to me and took quick actions on my case. I highly recommend this team of real professionals even for non-UK citizens.

Feb 2022   Sezim Beksultanova

I had online consultation with the partner Henry Brookman today. I was very happy with the service. I found him to be very insightful, knowledgeable and provided sound advice, as well as being kind and patient. It was a very comfortable discussion and he sent an email detailing our discussion very quickly discussing in our meeting in depth. I am amazed by the service we got just from a free consultation. I would highly recommend these solicitors!

Jan 2022   Shirley Christopher

We spoke at length and at no point felt like he was rushing us and we felt very comfortable. After our discussion we were also quickly sent an email detailing everything we were discussing in our meeting in depth. I am amazed by the service we got just from a free consultation. I would highly recommend these solicitors!

Dec 2021   Tina

I was fortunate to spend an hour running through a few questions with Natasha Slabas. She was quick to grasp the points raised and proposed a sensible way forward. Would recommend

Dec 2021   Nick Powell

I cannot praise the professionalism and courtesy too highly. The advice given in a very complex divorce matter, was clear, concise, enlightening and inspiring.

Nov 2021   Mary Barn

I contacted Henry Brookman because of the complex international aspect of my divorce and I’m very glad I did... Henry took his time explaining all the pro’s and contra’s... I now have a much clearer view over the situation and feel more confident going forward. I’m very grateful for the excellent advice I’ve received and not feeling rushed during the meeting.

Nov 2021   'A B'

Talitha offers sound advice, asks the right questions and advises you with what you need to know not just what you want to hear. I have no hesitation in recommending her services.

Sep 2021   Anu Vidyarthi

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 8470