Henry Brookman highlights the pitfalls associated with gathering evidence prior to divorce. Published online in Here Is The City.

Divorce is an emotionally charged and often very sad time for both sides. In part, it is the divorce solicitor’s job to guide their client through the divorce process with a calm and astute head so that the outcome is as positive as it can be. Increasingly however, people are starting their divorce process with a more ‘business orientated’ viewpoint and are willing to fight as hard as they can to ensure their settlement represents what they feel they are due.

There are likely to be several reasons why this approach has become more common in recent years. To some extent this could be influenced by a tougher economic environment where people are especially keen to protect their assets. Additionally, as women have increased their earnings they have developed much greater awareness of their financial worth – the days of when a wife believed that the husband ‘deserved’ the larger share are past. Also, divorces and settlements gain much more publicity than they ever did, so press coverage and a simple ‘Google search’ can help provide background information regarding settlements.

Gathering evidence for divorce – the impact of Tchenguiz & Ors v Imerman

Part of divorce involves gathering evidence. After all, financial assets that cannot be identified are very difficult to split. Bank statements, financial documents or paperwork relating to business ownership etc. are all valuable evidence when it comes to proving what is in the ‘pot’. But how do the Courts view evidence that has been ‘intercepted’ by a spouse?

The simple answer to the question is that the Courts will not look favourably on evidence which is considered to be stolen material. The recent very high profile case of Tchenguiz & Ors v Imerman proved this. Drinks magnate, Mr Imerman, was married to Lisa Tchenguiz Imerman. To gather evidence for the case, the wife’s brothers downloaded material from Mr Imerman’s computer to try and prove the value of his assets. The Tchenguiz brothers’ behaviour was considered so inappropriate by the Court of Appeal that the Judges created some hard new law to punish this type of behaviour in the future.

Now, the old self-help principle (known as the Hilderbrand principle) – whereby a spouse could obtain documents belonging to their partner by photocopying items, or printing emails etc. – is no longer useable. The Court ruled that a spouse (and their divorce solicitor) who secretly obtain documents or information may have no defence against an injunction or breach of confidentiality proceedings. The Court may not admit the improperly-obtained documents into evidence. Simply put, this means there is no longer the right to ‘self-help’.

How can evidence be gathered?

The issue with regard to gathering evidence is deciding whether the individual who gathers the information has some sort of implied right to see it. This is certainly open to interpretation. For example, if a spouse happens to view some emails that are left on their partner’s computer screen, do they have a right to read them? Or is it acceptable to read mobile phone messages when borrowing a spouse’s telephone?

Gathering as many facts about a couple’s finances is critical to a successful outcome in financial negotiations, but if that evidence is gathered in an inappropriate manner it may be worthless.

Therefore, before a husband or wife chooses to gather evidence in advance of them announcing their intentions to divorce, they would be wise to seek legal advice as to how that evidence should be appropriately gathered.

If you would like to know more about this issue please contact Brookman Solicitors for more information.

Got a question? Ask us now…

Kindly complete the form below to send an enquiry. Your message will be sent to one of our solicitors. Discretion is guaranteed.

Your Information

  • Consider including information such as: the name of your spouse (if relevant), the country you live in, the background to your problem.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Over 2000 FREE
consultations and counting…

Our free consultation can help you more clearly understand the legal issues relating your case and what your options are to move forward.

Request your free consultation

Or send us an enquiry

I had a 30-minute consultation with Samantha Jago where she clearly explained all my options and followed up with a detailed email of notes. I would highly recommend if you need help to clarify where you stand and getting options for how you move forward.

Jun 2024   Katherine Davey

I recently had a one hour pro bono consultation with Samantha Jago. I was really blown away by how much she was able to digest in such a short period of time and even more so by the report which I received shortly after.

Apr 2024   S DF

I had applied for a free consultation and I was contacted in a very short timeframe. Thank you so much for the insightful and thorough consultation, Kevin Danagher. You made me feel at ease and you provided clear expectations with the initial info I had provided... I have now a much better understanding on my query.

Feb 2024   Sonia Accardi

We had a very useful first consultation with Amber Matheson today. Amber took the time to understand our (somewhat complicated) set-up, and offered good, understandable advice on next steps. She followed up with a very thorough email clarifying what we had discussed. Highly recommended.

Feb 2024   Lucie

Lovely friendly experience. All questions were answered so that I understood completely.

Dec 2023   Ali Catlin

Very balanced, fair and pragmatic advice. Thoroughly recommend!!

Nov 2023   James Elliott

Henry graciously provided his time for a consultation. I found him to be highly knowledgeable, empathetic and he provided excellent advice which put my mind at ease. Would highly recommend Henry and his firm.

Oct 2023   Allan Ang

Henry Brookman went above and beyond during the free consultation, and even overran the allocated time. He provided invaluable professional advice in a courteous manner. I recommend his firm without reservation.

Sep 2023   Mario Ignatov

I only had my initial free review with Amelia yet I already feel much more strengthened in my legal and financial position. I am currently reflecting on the steps I want to take to negotiate my desired outcome of the financial settlement but, when I am ready to use the services of a lawyer, Amelia is definitely the top on my list.

Sep 2023   Nahid Toubia

I had a zoom consultation with Lauren Moir and she was incredible. Very patient, insightful and reassuring. She also advised me based on my previous conversations with another firm and also clarified various positions I am in. Highly recommend.

Aug 2023   Gary Hawes

I was very impressed with the friendly, helpful and professional service offered by Brookman Solicitors. The generous advice and knowledge offered during the initial free consultation has enabled us to have a much better understanding of our case and plan a way forward.

Jul 2023   Peter Jackson

I had a first consultation with Kevin, who very diligently and professionally provided an exhaustive overview of the divorce process and the best approach for my specific case.

Jul 2023   Giulia Matteo

Great service and excellent advice at the initial consultation. I would certainly recommend and use in the future.

Jul 2023   Tom James

Google Reviews
Ask A Question

Contact Us

If you have questions, contact us now, we can help you.

Enquire Now

Or call us on +44 (0)20 7430 8470