Prison terms in family proceedings

Date: January 3rd, 2014 - Written by: Brookman Solicitors

Father jailed again for non-return of child…

Mr Justice Holman has again jailed a father for contempt arising from his refusal to return his small daughter to the United Kingdom. During a family holiday in Egypt in December 2011 he put his daughter in the care of family members there. He returned to England, and the child’s mother took proceedings against him, which led to the father being imprisoned for 21 months. He was due to be released in November 2013 but Mr Justice Holman imposed a further term of another 6 months for his continued refusal to obey the Court’s Orders in bringing the child back to England. In his remarks on sentencing Mr Justice Holman called the father’s evidence “shifty, evasive and plainly dishonest.” This case confirms the growing tendency of the English Courts to impose substantial prison terms for contempt of Court Orders.

More information on this case can be found in the Yorkshire Evening Post relating to the case of the Salama Family.

The case of Mr Scott Young…

In the celebrated and long running case of Mr Scott Young, he too was sentenced for contempt of Disclosure Orders. In his case there was a long delay before in fact the imprisonment began. Initially the Court suspended the sentence for a period of time on condition Mr Scott Young did provide answers and documents, and then extended that deadline by reason of ill-health. Finally in January 2013 he claimed to have complied with the Order, but having considered his efforts Mr Justice Moor concluded that he was satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that Mr Scott Young had in fact failed to do so – primarily because he had still failed to settle the vital issue of where his legal funding had been coming from. Mr Justice Moor found Mr Young’s explanation that his friends were willing to give generous donations but not provide documentary proof of them to be “absurd”, and he concluded that there had been “a flagrant and deliberate contempt over a very long period.”

Share:
Tags: , ,

Google Reviews

Brookman Solicitors

51 Reviews

Jo Hannah 09/03/2019

I am very thankful to Mr Henry Brookman for his time, understanding and advice. I would highly recommend this firm.

Jeffrey Schenck 06/02/2019

Henry Brookman listened carefully and provided clear, thoughtful, sound advice that took into account the complexity of my situation. All of my dealings with the firm were handled with sensitivity and respect. I would definitely recommend the services of Brookman Solicitors.

Ilona Galiyeva 29/01/2019

I’ve dealt with Mr. Brookman himself and he is very peasant to work with. Listens to your demands and is very helpful in terms of providing advice.

Milla Linke 24/01/2019

Mr Brookman is very professional and helpful. After my initial consultation I have more clarity and understanding into my situation. I would highly recommend this firm.

Mr Man 09/01/2019

VERY PROFESSIONAL . My initial telephone contact to this firm was handled very professionally. First impressions really do matter. The details of my enquiry were taken and I soon became eased to believe that I being listened to and relevant details were being noted. My subsequent initial assessment interview was just as thorough and professional, consistent with my previous experience. Choosing a solicitor to act on your behalf is a very important consideration. Although my case is still on going, I have every confidence and peace of mind that I will be concluded well.